Whether or not someone achievestheir aimsis mostly by a question of luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree
Nowadays, an increasing number of people argue that successful people reach their dream because of luck. I completely disagree with that idea.
I believe that having a lot of people work hard in order to fulfil their target and Steve Jobs is one of the big illustrate. He tried to good at study in school time and then, he operated a company with a thousand times indulge in the code world. After being fired by his own enterprise, by the patience and talent, he came back and made a revolution for his corporation today, it is Apple Corporation. Another example is Nick Vujicic. He is a great man, who survived despite the absence of all four limbs. Especially, he graduated with a double major in accounting and financial planning. The two people show obviously that one's success does not depend on luck.
On the other hand, luck is a tiny part of the effect of one's career because no one can live by relying on luck rather than their own ability. If a student depends on luck without preparing for the examination, he will fail after all. In addition, luck is an abstract thing that just exists in belief and in some cases. For instance, someone wins the lottery is absolutely due to luck because of taking no attempt. Unfortunately, they can not win this game forever. Luck is something that people have all in their mind.
In conclusion, according to these reasons, I completely believe that to attain the aims, it wholly depends on the passion and hard-working.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-05 | Khaihoang | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | nhoxkey200 | 11 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | nhoxkey200 | 11 | view |
| 2019-10-13 | coolR | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-30 | bennguyen95 | 84 | view |
- The diagram below shows the environmental issues raised by a product over its lifecycle.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The diagram below shows the environmental issues raised by a product over its lifecycle.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons 78
- Modern technology now allows rapid and uncontrolled access to an exchange of information. Far from being beneficial, this is a danger to our societies.To what extent do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples f 61
- Some people think that environmental problems are too big for individuals to solve, while others think that the government cannot solve these environmental problems unless individuals make some action.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 57, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...d, luck is a tiny part of the effect of ones career because no one can live by relyi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, after all, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1212.0 1615.20841683 75% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67953667954 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6218689644 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610038610039 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.6724841502 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.75 106.682146367 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1875 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1875 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0815673842275 0.244688304435 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.028556609063 0.084324248473 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0307976084243 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0467067965898 0.151304729494 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421722459953 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.0946893788 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 12.4159519038 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.