The figures for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980
The chart gives information about the figures for imprisonment along five decades from 1930 to 1980 in five countries. There were five countries will be figured out and measured in amount of prisoners. Overall, as can be seen that the most positive movement trend happened to be in United States thoroughly whilst the lowest amount of prisoners was in Great Britain incrementally.
Regarding to the data, the largest amount of the captive had to be in United States which the trends fluctuated from 100 prisoners in 1930 to 130 prisoners in 1940 and ended 135 prisoners in 1980 totally. The next second biggest amount was in Canada that tend to decrease which started at 120 prisoners and terminated at 90 prisoners in 1980. Then it was followed by New Zealand that incarcerated 100 prisoners in 1930, declined to 50 prisoners in 1950 and got up to 135 prisoners in 1980 respectively.
Another country which had imprisonments was Australia that immured 70 prisoners in 1930 initially and it was fluctuating but tend to decline and ended at 50 prisoners in 1980 obviously. Then , the most smallest amount of the captive happened to be in Great Britain but comprehensively the trends was increasing gradually which started from 30 prisoners in 1930 to 40 prisoners in 1950 and finally went up to 85 prisoners in 1980.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-23 | poca | view | |
| 2023-06-18 | ThHuong | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-28 | vuhungbo | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-01 | honganhn459@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2023-02-12 | phuongnguyen1234 | 67 | view |
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems 73
- Average Carbon Dioxide (CO2) emission per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal, between 1967 to 2007 73
- One government’s spending on culture and education in 1995 and 2005 and the number of people participating in arts event in the same years 67
- The differences in wheat exports over three different areas 73
- US spending patterns between 1966 and 1996. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 215, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'second the biggest'.
Suggestion: second the biggest
...135 prisoners in 1980 totally. The next second biggest amount was in Canada that tend to decre...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 191, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... at 50 prisoners in 1980 obviously. Then , the most smallest amount of the captive...
^^
Line 5, column 198, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'smallest' (without 'most') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: smallest
...prisoners in 1980 obviously. Then , the most smallest amount of the captive happened to be in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 198, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'most the smallest'.
Suggestion: most the smallest
...prisoners in 1980 obviously. Then , the most smallest amount of the captive happened to be in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, regarding, second, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1098.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92376681614 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87226744587 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493273542601 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.5230207373 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.25 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.875 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223262481223 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134013024195 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133106936715 0.0843802449381 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18319544125 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103487778985 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.