The graph below shows difference sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005.
The line chart illustrates three different categories which accounted for air pollutants (million tonnes), in the UK, from 1990 to 2005.
Overall, the total amount of air pollutants fell steadily over the period. Besides, the number of the industry was the most significant dropped in this time.
There was a dramatic decrease in the total air pollutants from 7 (1990) to 4 million tonnes (1999). Between 1999 and 2005, this figure continuously declined from 4 to just over 3 million tonnes. By contrast, the number of air pollutants in transport slightly fluctuated around 1 million tonnes over sixteen years.
The figure of air pollutants in industry reduced suddenly from 5.5 (1990) to 3 million tonnes (1996). In the next 10 years, this number gradually fell to 2 million tonnes. Besides that, the air pollutants of households contributed 0.8 million tonnes at the beginning of this time. Although this figure fluctuated over the period, it also remained below 1 million tonnes (2005).
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | dothai | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-06 | prathamesh27 | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-15 | quanganh3110 | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-14 | JennieD | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-02 | elteembored | 67 | view |
- The charts below compare the age structure of the populations of France and India in 1984. 56
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the bestroute to a successful career, while others believe that it is better to get a jobstraight after school. Discuss both views 67
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. 78
- The map below is of the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket (S) is planned for the town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket. 73
- The graph below shows difference sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...ries which accounted for air pollutants million tonnes, in the UK, from 1990 to 2005. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... tonnes, in the UK, from 1990 to 2005. Overall, the total amount of air polluta...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...most significant dropped in this time. There was a dramatic decrease in the tot...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d 1 million tonnes over sixteen years. The figure of air pollutants in industry...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 826.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13043478261 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68709464013 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534161490683 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 18.6775266028 43.030603864 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.6 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28029943835 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12939652072 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102644135925 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200842536371 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0979628292823 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.