Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of the old
houses in the local areas, while others think that people should have freedom to
build houses of their own styles. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
While someone believe that the modern building should inherit the format of the traditional houses, others state that people should construct houses of their own free-styles. In my opinion, I strongly agree with the second one.
On the one hand, the newly built houses will cost the fortune for the construction if it follow the character of the old ones. Firstly, it is hard to find the rare and expensive materials, nowadays such as porcelain, pottery, wood or a pieces of quartz which constructed the traditional building. Secondly, we have to pay lots of money and time, of course to decorate the houses in the old style. Finally, the maintenance costs of houses constructed in the traditional way also higher than their modern counterparts. Precious woods and rare pottery, for examples, is really hard to reserve with moister of atmospheres and oxidation of environments.
On the other hand, if people have freedom for constructing the building in free style, they will innovate the modern architecture's revolution. There are, of course more and more new and strange houses can appear in the near future. Besides, building not only can have innovation in shape but also will have function for providing for modern world's change. Marina Bay Sands, for examples, which have function as hotel, casino, shopping mall and the world's conference is the iconic building of Singapore.
In conclusion, although newly building could follow the form of the classic houses but I believe that everyone should have freedom to build the houses in their own format.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-04 | petertrung | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-14 | Nguyen Trong Trung | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-14 | Nguyen Trong Trung | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-14 | Nguyen Trong Trung | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-02 | Tri H. Ho | 78 | view |
- The diagram shows the small scale production of smoked fish 76
- The pie charts below show the proportions of the total school expenditure in five different sources between 1981 and 2001. 61
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because oftechnology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that peoplemake? Has this been a positive or negative development? 78
- In some countries, many more people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 61
- The tables show the amount of money spent on Fairtrade coffee and bananas in two separate years in the UK Switzerland Denmark Belgium and Sweden 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 15, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'believes'.
Suggestion: believes
While someone believe that the modern building should inherit...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 90, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'follows'?
Suggestion: follows
... the fortune for the construction if it follow the character of the old ones. Firstly,...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 235, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a piece' or simply 'pieces'?
Suggestion: a piece; pieces
...ays such as porcelain, pottery, wood or a pieces of quartz which constructed the traditi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 118, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'architectures'' or 'architecture's'?
Suggestion: architectures'; architecture's
...ee style, they will innovate the modern architectures revolution. There are, of course more a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 504, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ce is the iconic building of Singapore. In conclusion, although newly building c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, firstly, if, really, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, of course, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1309.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13333333333 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70228803619 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552941176471 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 396.0 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.761888454 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.083333333 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.8333333333 7.06120827912 196% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260750204597 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0955623640124 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0983362914913 0.0667982634062 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190884323424 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0895578376587 0.056905535591 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.