In the modern world, many children spend a lot of time in front of computers, televisions, and smartphones. This is very harmful to them.
To what extent do you agree?
In this digital age, many children have been significantly increased time-consumption on technology devices. Some people believe that this dramatic rise causes deleterious effects on them. This essay will discuss why excessive technology use is harmful to children.
First and foremost, the heavy expenditure of time on technology gadgets could lead to a dearth of social interactions which have negative impacts on children's mental health, even more seriously by causing long-lasting psychological effects. Sure enough, those lacking social interactions typically have some common symptoms such as shy and timidity, which could be improved simply by outside-events participation or physical activities engagement. For example, in the formative ages, if parents encourage their offspring to engage in social activities, such as playing on the playground with friends, they will evolve into a confident grown-up manner. Therefore, having heavy exposure to digital devices without time consideration is a recipe for disaster.
Secondly, it is clear that visual deterioration is the utmost in the negative effects of excessive technology use. To some extent, focusing intensely on the digital screen lays great stress on the eyes, which badly damage the vision. For instance, the percentage of short-sighted children has exponentially inclined to recent years mostly due to the unconsidered on-screen time. More seriously, in youngsters, nowadays, the overusing smartphone at wee hours habit wipes out, which not only decreases the quality of their sleep but also have serious repercussions for their eyes. Long story short, spending a huge amount of time on computers, televisions, and smartphone will put harm on children's eyes.
In conclusion, with the growth of technology, there is a significant increase in the expenditure of time in technology devices, which negatively affects children in both physical and mental way. Regardless of its advantages, time-consumption should be taken into consideration.
- Many modern children spend a great deal of time sitting in front of a television or computer screen. This is extremely harmful to their development. Therefore Parents should strictly limit the time children spend in this way.To what extent, do you agree o 61
- Crime and punishment 89
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989. 89
- In the modern world, many children spend a lot of time in front of computers, televisions, and smartphones. This is very harmful to them.To what extent do you agree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 426, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'activities'' or 'activity's'?
Suggestion: activities'; activity's
...utside-events participation or physical activities engagement. For example, in the formati...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 453, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'hours'' or 'hour's'?
Suggestion: hours'; hour's
...wadays, the overusing smartphone at wee hours habit wipes out, which not only decreas...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1719.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.78787878788 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2234727316 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643097643098 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.200237839 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.785714286 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148163124308 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0570337224111 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058566152524 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0977657054495 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564674359321 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.3 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.