The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens.
What is best way to judge effectiveness of any leader? Should he be judged based on status of people he is ruling? This is quiet debatable. Here, the author asserts explicitly that the best way for evaluating the leader whether he is effective or not is examining condition of people he is rulling. I mostly agree with the contention and defend my thesis based on two persuasive argument with evidence. I also present concession when my theisis may dramatically weakened in some cases.
Firstly, the best leader are the one who can persuade people that his ideology is best and the measure by which leadership can be evaluated is the ability to influence people in believing him. The best leader will prove practically that his idea is supreame by imposing his idea on the ground level. So, by watching the status of the people, we can easily judge if the ideology inherited by the leader worked or not and thereby, judging if the leader is truly capable or not.
Secondly, the good leaders are those who can not only thrive himself in the ladder of sucess but also uplift the followers. Since leaders are the one whom people follow because of belief that his ideology will bring positive in the society, the leader should not throw his supporters in the death-beds for his personal goals. If the leader is burgeoning and the followers are suffering then the leadership is not considered very effective. For instance, present North Korean leader have many followers and the way people loinize him should have caused world community to declare him best leader, but world does not consider him best leader. It is because people in North Korea are suffering of extreame poverty, illeteracy and lack of healthy life style. So, to be effective leader personal goal must be relinquished for the betterment of the people.
Admittedly however, in some cases, the status of the people may not be useful way of judging any leader. Status of people may have been due to natural causes without control of any leader. For instance, the due to earthquake in Nepal in 2015 ,thousands of people died by the disaster. It is caused by natural causes not due to the less effective leader of country as he had no control over the situation. Similarly, in these scenario external factors have to be taken into account for the status of peoople.
In conclusion, the subject matter is moot and there are no easy virdict. But, glancing upon juxtaposition of two opposing view here, in most of the cases it seems veritable that judging a leader based on status of people is justifiable and in some extreame cases judging based on status of people may be superfluous.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | sapana | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | shuocurity | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-29 | priyanayak | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-17 | yesh | 50 | view |
| 2019-09-23 | anvay | 50 | view |
- 35 The following appeared in a letter from the owner of the Sunnyside Towers apartment complex to its manager One month ago all the showerheads in the first three buildings of the Sunnyside Towers complex were modified to restrict maximum water flow to on 60
- The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds. 83
- People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making. 16
- Claim: Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future.Reason: Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate. 83
- Some people believe that competition for high grades motivates students to excel in the classroom. Others believe that such competition seriously limits the quality of real learning 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 6, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the best'.
Suggestion: is the best
What is best way to judge effectiveness of any leade...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y dramatically weakened in some cases. Firstly, the best leader are the one who...
^^^
Line 5, column 580, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'him the best'.
Suggestion: him the best
... have caused world community to declare him best leader, but world does not consider him...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 625, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'him the best'.
Suggestion: him the best
...est leader, but world does not consider him best leader. It is because people in North K...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 242, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
..., the due to earthquake in Nepal in 2015 ,thousands of people died by the disaster...
^^
Line 7, column 420, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this scenario' or 'these scenarios'?
Suggestion: this scenario; these scenarios
...ntrol over the situation. Similarly, in these scenario external factors have to be taken into ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 318, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on status of people may be superfluous.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, similarly, so, then, for instance, in conclusion, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2199.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 457.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81181619256 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62358717085 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57250765446 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.466083150985 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 706.5 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3214174016 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.9545454545 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7727272727 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72727272727 5.21951772744 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195861391663 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06038077364 0.0831039109588 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552360692714 0.0758088955206 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109636569236 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0361381674285 0.0667264976115 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.