Some people think it is good thing for senior management positions to have very high salaries compared to other workers of the same company or organisation. To what extent you agree?
Initially, there is a saying :" practice makes perfect" which means all the hard work will definitely be paid off. Consequently, it can be seen in our human workforce that the senior management position can have higher pays than the novice or journeyman. As a result, a faction of people consider that case as a good stuff. And then, I will try to throw light upon this declaration as well as I will try to posit my perspective about it.
To begin with, there are multifarious reasons that shore up those people who have the confirmation. One possible inducement from my eyesight is to create the workers' motivation. To explain, it is considered as a chance for the trivial workers to satisfy their long for fortune, for instance: if they want to seize the opportunity to become well off, they have to augment their faculties to achieve higher rank which is equivalent to better salaries. Probing further, this regulation could probably enhance the working quality of the business. As an illustration, they may be heavily involved in the job, creating a throbbing office atmosphere and hence result in a considerable impetus of the company.
On the other hand, the opposite can be observed when it comes not to the motivates but only rivalry. Additionally, people might harbour in mind the thought of an unfair working environment. Critically, they may be more mindful of the income than the development of their career paths. Ongoing research has indicated an accelerated the ratio of 40% in discomfort and jealousy categories in an actual company where there is a significant disparity between the managers and the common workers.
Conclusively, this trend obviously bring in both merits and demerits. However, I pertinaciously believe that for the long-term impacts, the advantage is going to far outweight the drawbacks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-28 | Nicolas | 84 | view |
| 2019-06-27 | Lê Võ Nhật Quang | 89 | view |
| 2018-10-04 | honza | 11 | view |
| 2018-08-17 | drtruong92 | 89 | view |
| 2018-07-31 | eyraen | 84 | view |
- Quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 78
- The Chart below show the males and females arrested over 5 years and the reasons for the most recent arrests. 78
- If countries are serious about solving traffic problems they should tax private cars very heavily and use the money to provide free or very cheap rail travel 69
- Some people think a job not only provides income but also a social life. Others think it is better to develop social life with people you do not work with. Discuss both view and give your opinion. 67
- In many countries, very few young people read newspapers or follow the news on TV. What do you think are the causes of this?What solutions can you suggest? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 217, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... that the senior management position can have higher pays than the novice or jour...
^^
Line 3, column 159, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
...ement from my eyesight is to create the workers motivation. To explain, it is considere...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, however, if, may, so, then, well, for instance, as a result, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11258278146 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97376803847 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635761589404 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1616403058 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.933333333 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1333333333 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.73333333333 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133950297809 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0373527617757 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0350962718852 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0673375913418 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293309704832 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.