Petrol is important as it is the energy source of vehicles. Thus, some people may reckon that raising the price of petrol is able to resolve the serious circumstance of the traffic system and air pollution, but I believe that this statement is inefficiency to settle these matters.
To begin with, while the way of raising the cost of petrol may lead to decrease the driving intent of the vehicle driver, we should know that the power resource of vehicle is changing to electricity instead of petrol now. So, the traditional vehicle will be outdated instant by the latest vehicle designing and the significance of arising petrol’s price will be lower. Also, the vehicle owners would not be affected by this suggestion since there are all rich person as far as they own a valuable car, thus, the obstruction of high price is not a feasible strategy. Therefore, the increasing traffic as well as the poor air is not suitable to settle by the above suggestion.
There are several plans to release the traffic and pollutions situation. An international example would be strong support that road management in China. The government is managing the usage of the road by restricting half of the drivers who just allow to drive on assigned days, such as Monday to Thursday, which reflection of the above measurement is positive that it drops the crowded environment on the road as well as release the flue gas emission comes from vehicles. Thus, the recommendation of restricting driving days may be the best way to solve a serious environment.
In conclusion, as the result of raising the petrol’s price may not obvious, I strongly disagree with this statement and I reckon that controlling road traffic is better than the original method.
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging for admission outweigh the disadvantages? 56
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australia men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The tables below give information abou sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 465, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'people', 'persons'?
Suggestion: people; persons
...his suggestion since there are all rich person as far as they own a valuable car, thus...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, while, i reckon, in conclusion, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24113475177 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.40797668939 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563829787234 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.1886889159 49.4020404114 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.363636364 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6363636364 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2727272727 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179843416537 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692760545515 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0312689052351 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106850075555 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0164759226346 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.