University should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is noticeable that more male students choose physics, maths as their majors than female students, while most girls prefer history and laws. This can be explained by their performance in those subjects and their interest. Therefore, university should not accept equal numbers of male and female students in all subjects.
To begin with, boys can be better at some subjects than girls. Although it is true that everyone was born with the same brain system, the way they think can be quite different. Girls are usually emotional, whereas boys tend to use reasons to make explanations. For example, it has been surveyed that male students can solve the math problem more quickly than famale students though they are taught by the same teacher and given the same assignments every day. It is because boys excel at utilizing math theories and calculating without calculators. Another example can be seen in physics. With plenty of mathematical equations, the movement of a ball can be described as inaccessible. To solve a certain physics problem requires the understanding of all equations, which can be extremely hard for most girls. Thus, male and female students have different ability on different subjects.
Besides, fewer girls are willing to study some subjects than boys, and consequently it is unfair for university to reduce the number of male students for the sake of balancing students. For example, in my university, only a few girls attend subjects like structural mechanics, while there are usually more than one hundred boys are willing to learn those subjects. If university only accept equal numbers of males and females, the total number of students will decrease dramatically with only ten boys and ten girls. As a result, those boys have to unwillingly change their subjects into others they dislike, such as laws and marketing.
In conclusion, while equal numbers of boys and girls seemingly indicate the university attaches equal importance to students regardless of their sexes, this measure will result in a lot of students being forced to choose subjects they are not interested in.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-07 | cindycornelia98 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | cindycornelia98 | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | cindycornelia98 | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-28 | Narges.s | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-25 | Moaz | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 67
- It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician.Discuss both these views 73
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The first below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household.The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons 73
- In most professions and academics fields, imagination is more important than knowledge. 62
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, if, so, therefore, thus, whereas, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1773.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16909620991 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68014560752 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518950437318 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6534853436 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.294117647 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1764705882 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.17647058824 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23299391779 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0828913133072 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107693501055 0.0667982634062 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174491732823 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.067118565134 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.