The column graph compares the changes in the proportion of population in India, China, the USA and Japan in 1950 and 2000, and also indicates the proiections for 2050. It is clear from the graph that China had the highest Percentage of world population in 1950 and 2000, but estimates show that India will take the lead by 2050.
In 1950, China accounted for a little over a quarter of the world's population. Although it decreased to a little under a quarter, it was still the highest in 2000, compared to the other three countries. It is estimated that the population of China will continue to drop and would reach approxim atelyl9/o by 2050.
India showed an opposing trend to China. The population in India in 1950 was 75%, which was considerably lower than that of China. However, the population increased moderately to 19% by 2000 and is further expected to grow and reach nearly 20%, which would be the highest among the given countries by 2050.
When it comes to the population of the USA and japan, both showed a decrease from 1950 to 2000. It is predicted that the percentage will remain the same in the USA, whereas in Japan, the population is likely to keep falling till 2050.
Overall Japan had the least population in the given period, and the population is expected to decrease to approximately 3% by 2050.
- Happiness is considered very important in life. Why it is difficult to define? What factors are important in achieving happiness. 89
- In many countries schools have severe problems with student behavior. What do you think are the causes of this? what solutions can you suggest? 67
- The climograph below shows average monthly temperatures and rainfall in the city of Kolkata.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Millions of dollars are spent on space research every year SOme people argue the money should be spent on improving living standards on Earth Do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 61, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...nted for a little over a quarter of the worlds population. Although it decreased to a ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, still, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1102.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72961373391 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56824550733 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467811158798 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4509843387 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.181818182 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1818181818 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.45454545455 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346194565898 0.215688989381 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142961535414 0.103423049105 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0896871819541 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202975889376 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0837384158262 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.