The diagram gives information about the disadvantage of walking for the environment when tourists visit to the countryside.
Overall, it can be seen that the process of trampling affects hugely to quality of soil and vegetation.
First of stage, the feet of tourists flatten grass when they sightsee the beautiful landscape, it is named trampling. Consequently, vegetation and sold are influence seriously. Under the pressure due to moving of feet, plants become weaker and do not grow. Besides, soil becomes hard and compact so air and water quality are reduces. As a result, water runs off the land and erosion increased noticeably. Moreover, the standard of land impacts to the development of plants. Therefore, they do not grow and reproduce which meant that reduction of vegetation. At the end, when people trample to the land everyday, there is increasing erosion and of course, quality of soil and vegetation is decreased seriously.
- The graph below shows radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 61
- the graph shows the number of visitors to a variety of art galleries in 2011 79
- In many countries, schools have severe problems with student behaviour. What do you think are the causes of this?What solutions can you suggest? 61
- Cement and concrete production 56
- In school and universities, girls tend to choose art while boys like science. What are the reasons for this trend and do you think this tendency should be changed? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 602, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...he end, when people trample to the land everyday, there is increasing erosion and of cou...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, first, if, moreover, so, therefore, of course, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 793.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25165562914 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89463827596 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.629139072848 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.1133420283 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.3 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0698409479516 0.215688989381 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0244099765735 0.103423049105 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505978693652 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0609033044395 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0654873928801 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.