Some people think that computer and internet are important in children education. But others think students can learn effectively in schools and with teachers. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
There is a school of thought that believes that computer and the Internet play a pivotal role in educating. While reasons can be given to justify this, I would agree that the supportive aid from schools and teachers greatly contribute to the learning process of students.
On the one hand, there are those who argue that students can reaps the benefits of learning with the help of computer and the Internet for a number of reasons. One argument is that learners acquire a great number of skills and knowledge in a proactive way by searching through such online websites as Google and Youtube. Another justification is that a colossal amount of data storage provide a productive learning environment. This IS exemplified by the fact that computer or google drive on the Internet can assist students to store more learning materials than thick piles of books, which boosts students' study productivity.
On the other hand, I side with those who contend that schooling is an important factors when it comes to effective learning. Primarily, students might gain knowledge in a pragmatic method with the aid of their teachers. Compared to computer, teachers offer a great deal of opportunities for their students to put theory into practice and give more rigorous explanations when the students do not understand the materials. In addition, students might derive social skills from their teachers. Such skills as communication, negotiation or problems dealing have an essential role to play in orienting students' characteristics and helping them building relationships with others, which is also a helpful skill in the learning process.
In conclusion, despite several arguments in favour of the Internet and computer, I firmly hold the view that students can acquire knowledge effectively from their teachers and schools.
- The diagram below shows how the parts of old car batteries are used to create new car batteries and other products. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011 61
- Task 1: The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US, EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010. 67
- The graph shows the information about international conferences in three capital cities in 1980-2010. 73
- Some people think that school should reward students who show the best academic results, while others believe that it is more important to reward students who show improvements. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 238, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proactive way" with adverb for "proactive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... a great number of skills and knowledge in a proactive way by searching through such online websit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 81, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'factor'?
Suggestion: factor
... contend that schooling is an important factors when it comes to effective learning. Pr...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 640, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[9]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to build' or 'build'.
Suggestion: to build; build
...udents characteristics and helping them building relationships with others, which is als...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1538.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2852233677 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8948580883 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553264604811 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.569752247 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.166666667 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.91666666667 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251407352311 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0934644540622 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522540574695 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142630452512 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.030812208846 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.