tpo39
The reading and the listening passage have a debate on factors which are responsible for mass-extinction at the end of the Triassic time. The writer puts forward 3 main points which are refuted by following speaker.
First, the writer suggests that sea levels were decreased and shallow ocean creatures were died; as a result, shortage of food in coastal areas leaded to extinction. The speaker views this issue from opposite angle. According to her, coastal fluctuation was gradual. For decreasing the mass population in Triassic period, this change in sea levels should happen sudden. Thus, it is not advisable that reducing sea levels take part in that extinction.
The second reason offered by the writer is weather cooling because of volcanic activity. Huge amount of SO2 led to reducing in world temperatures, it consequently damages to living species. The speaker casts doubt on this assumption by saying that excess SO2 in the air in the present of water could clear and return to the earth as acidic rains. So, the short period of abound SO2 could not produce such problem.
Last, the writer proposes that asteroid strike may result large amount of dust and prevent receiving sunlight to earth. This event destroyed plants and made trouble for other species. On contrary, the speaker holds an opposite view. She claims that very few scientist believes asteroid strike and they could not find asteroid creature. In addition, this event have happened 12 million years before mass extinction. Furthermore, it does not have relationship to this matter.
- To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. 76
- TPO 44Question: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific theories presented in the reading passage. European silver coin 83
- tpo 6online encyclopedias 3
- TPO 15Question: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific solutions presented the reading passage.To stop spread of cane toad in Australia 85
- 47It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 400, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t period of abound SO2 could not produce such problem. Last, the writer propos...
^^
Line 7, column 255, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun scientist seems to be countable; consider using: 'few scientists'.
Suggestion: few scientists
... an opposite view. She claims that very few scientist believes asteroid strike and they could...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, may, second, so, thus, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1313.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 254.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16929133858 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58799205861 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625984251969 0.540411800872 116% => OK
syllable_count: 384.3 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.2789182958 49.2860985944 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.2352941176 110.228320801 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9411764706 21.698381199 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.76470588235 7.06452816374 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.3589403974 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 53.8541721854 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.11 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.