The tables compare the amount of money of selling coffee and bananas, in two separate years, in five difference EU nations.
The tables compare the amount of money of selling coffee and bananas, in two separate years, in five difference EU nations.
Overall, the sales of coffee in all countries rose over the periods while the sales of bananas went up only in three out of five nations. The UK had the highest points for selling two products.
The revenue from selling coffee dramatically increased, in the UK, from $1.5 (1999) to reach a peak of $20 million (2004). During this time, sales of this product rose double, in Switzerland, from $3 to $6 million. Although this figure also slightly climbed, in Denmark, Belgium, and Sweden, the sales of coffee in these countries still stayed below $2 million in both years.
Sales of bananas rose considerably, in the UK, from $15 (1999) to the highest point of $47 million (2004). The number of selling this product also rapidly increased, in Switzerland and Denmark, from $1 and $0.6 million (1999) to $5.5 and $4 million (2004), respectively. By contrast, this figure, in the two remain nations, decreased to around $1 million (2004).
- The graph below shows difference sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005. 67
- In some countries, many more people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 61
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views a 67
- The bar chart below shows the proportions of English men and women of different ages who were living alone in 2011. The pie chart compares the numbers of bedrooms in these one-person households. 61
- The bar chart below shows the proportions of English men and women of different ages who were living alone in 2011. The pie chart compares the numbers of bedrooms in these one-person households. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 189, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...roduct rose double, in Switzerland, from to million. Although this figure also s...
^^
Line 3, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ct rose double, in Switzerland, from to million. Although this figure also sligh...
^^
Line 3, column 195, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
... rose double, in Switzerland, from to million. Although this figure also slightly cli...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ee in these countries still stayed below million in both years. Sales of banana...
^^
Line 4, column 191, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reased, in Switzerland and Denmark, from and sh.6 million 1999 to .5 and million...
^^
Line 4, column 224, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...k, from and sh.6 million 1999 to .5 and million 2004, respectively. By contrast,...
^^
Line 4, column 226, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
... from and sh.6 million 1999 to .5 and million 2004, respectively. By contrast, this f...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 326, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... two remain nations, decreased to around million 2004.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 849.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87931034483 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56430702103 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51724137931 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 13.0 3.36585365854 386% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.042024874 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.3333333333 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88888888889 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296842827864 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163696718202 0.103423049105 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.298111662135 0.0843802449381 353% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.318955777653 0.15604864568 204% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.394717327494 0.0819641961636 482% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.