The table below gives information on the proportion of carbohydrates, protein and fat in three different diets.
The three pie charts given below point out proportion of carbohydrates, protein and fat in three different diets.
Overall, carbohydrate was give the most to the healthy diet for sport, while fat was the smallest segment. In comparison, carbohydrate and protein was equal redound to the average diet. And at the last confrontation, carbohydrate only was moiety to the health diet.
First of all, carbohydrate was account for 40% which was similar with protein to the average diet. Fat got 20% which the negative.
In other hand, carbohydrate made up 50% half-circle, followed by protein was 30% which the second highest categories, and the residue got by fat 20% in health diet.
And the last, carbohydrate got 60% which the highest all the categories, followed by protein was 25% to the healthy diet for sport. Fat got 15% which was the most diminutive all the denomination.
- The table below gives information on the proportion of carbohydrates, protein and fat in three different diets. 56
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010 73
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 56
- The table below gives information on the proportion of carbohydrates protein and fat in three different diets 68
- many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines. Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, while, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 742.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 146.0 196.424390244 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08219178082 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.47606760199 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92121480988 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 72.0 106.607317073 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.493150684932 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 210.6 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.77089563 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.4444444444 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2222222222 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199138944248 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104853431643 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.151302504086 0.0843802449381 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157936276411 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.185008717168 0.0819641961636 226% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.7 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 21.0 40.7170731707 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.