The proportion of carbohydrates, protein and fat in the three different diets
The three pie charts given below ilustrate the comparison information on the proportion of carbohydrates, protein and fat in the three different diets. The data present in precentage. Overall it can be seen that tge bigest peecentage was carbohydrates and while the smallest percentage was fat. There are types different diets, namely average diet, healthy diet, and healthy diet for sport
In the one hand the comparasion three pie charts, whic the bigest catagory in percentage was carbohydrates 60% followed by protein 40% and the smallest was fat 20%.
On the other hand, there are comporsion from three differents diets from degree percentage. To percentage the bigest are healthy diets for sport, carbohydrates 60%, protein 25%, fat 15% followed by healthy diet, charbohydrates 50%, protein 30%, fat 20%, and whic the smallest was average diet, carbohydrates 40%, protein 40%, and fat 20%, but for carbohydrates and protein, have the same percentage.
From the trhee pie charts can be accepted conclusion, there are trhee types different diets namely, average diet, healthy diet, and healthy diet for sport. From the three pie charts which the bigest was carbohydrates 60%, 50%, 40%, followed by protein 40%, 30%, 25% and which the smallest was fat namely 20%, 20%, 15%.
- The proportion of carbohydrates, protein and fat in the three different diets 67
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement? 56
- The average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010 73
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement? 56
- The average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 33.7804878049 47% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1081.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27317073171 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79246031704 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.434146341463 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.6733791298 43.030603864 194% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.125 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.625 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.424701534606 0.215688989381 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.202076358602 0.103423049105 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146018916362 0.0843802449381 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.297931895581 0.15604864568 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118743955495 0.0819641961636 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.03 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.