AIDS is a disease that has killed millions of people all over the world. Most of the cases of AIDS in the world are in poorer countries where the people can’t afford to buy the drugs that would help keep them alive and healthy. Many AIDS Advocacy Groups (AAGs) are trying to help the people in these developing countries get the health care they need to fight AIDS. AAGs are doing this in several ways.
First of all, they argue that the profits of these companies are too high and such high pricing is immoral in the face of such a devastating disease. AAGs believe that major drug companies should sell their AIDS medicines at a much lower cost so that AIDS patients who have very little money would not have to choose between buying their food or their medication.
Second, AAGs are trying to get governments to pay for AIDS drugs instead of individual people. In general, when buying in large quantities, the price goes down. Therefore, if a government bought enough medication for all the AIDS patients in its country, then the price per bottle of medication would be much lower than the price individuals currently pay when buying medication on their own.
Third, AAGs are beginning to encourage poor countries to make their own cheap versions of AIDS drugs, even though it is illegal to do so. If the drugs were made in the same country, this would not only reduce shipping costs, but it would also give many people jobs in these poorer countries.
In the reading passage that Scientists who study the warming trend have identified several key contributing factors.
However, the professor casts doubt on the point made in the reading passage with several reasons and example as follows.
First of all, the speaker says that the creation of landfills is not a significant contributor to the rise in global tempetures.
To be specific, supported evidence study show that 9 percent of methane influence green warm house.
methane remain less than one percent that atmosphere imposed land low significantly contributed to green warm .
Thus, the speaker contradicts rationale presented in the reading passage that the creation of landfills is a significant contributor to the rise in global temperatures.
Another point in the lecturer makes is that cause of global warming is not deforestation , which is not the harvesting of a large number of trees in a particular area.
For example, deforestation start does not matched carbon dioxide cycle.
It means that a tree dies naturally and begins to decay, most of the carbon dioxide that its absorbed during its lifetime reenters the atmosphere.
For example, the harvesting of wood by humans delays this process.
Lastly, the professor states that the current warming trend is not related to a naturally occurring cycle of climate change.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-14 | alex05622 | 3 | view |
| 2017-10-09 | GaladrielEna | 68 | view |
| 2017-10-09 | GaladrielEna | 80 | view |
| 2017-10-09 | GaladrielEna | 73 | view |
| 2017-10-09 | GaladrielEna | 71 | view |
- A short, type written, couple of paragraphs about the artist you want to write your analysis paper on. Why do you think this artist/artwork is important? 500-1000 words Must bring into class (see announcements for further instructions) 73
- rtists create art with purpose. What do you think this artist’s purpose was in creating this work? Why do you think this? What clues can be found in the artwork and the title that lead you to this conclusion? Are there other themes that are addressed w 56
- Essay topics: No one should expect to have privacy in the internet age. issue 1)rights of individual 2) national secret 3) benefits of information 73
- A short, type written, couple of paragraphs, about the artist you want to write your analysis paper on. Why do you think this artist/artwork is important? 60
- AIDS is a disease that has killed millions of people all over the world. Most of the cases of AIDS in the world are in poorer countries where the people can’t afford to buy the drugs that would help keep them alive and healthy. Many AIDS Advocacy Groups 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In the reading passage that Scientists w...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Methane
... methane influence green warm house. methane remain less than one percent that atmos...
^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 110, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... significantly contributed to green warm . Thus, the speaker contradicts ration...
^^
Line 15, column 89, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e of global warming is not deforestation , which is not the harvesting of a large ...
^^
Line 15, column 123, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...tation , which is not the harvesting of a large number of trees in a particular area. For exam...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 43, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'match'
Suggestion: match
...r example, deforestation start does not matched carbon dioxide cycle. It means that ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, lastly, so, thus, for example, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1161.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 212.0 270.72406181 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47641509434 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89081676287 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 145.348785872 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575471698113 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 345.6 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.7984354311 49.2860985944 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.545454545 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2727272727 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.18181818182 7.06452816374 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 11.0 4.09492273731 269% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0106469658934 0.272083759551 4% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0039591745399 0.0996497079465 4% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0084810019997 0.0662205650399 13% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0039591745399 0.162205337803 2% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0084810019997 0.0443174109184 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.3589403974 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.2367328918 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.