In this modern world, where technology has developed rapidly, people have more access to get what they want. The evolution of the internet has eased the process of searching something. So, I agree with the statement.
The first example is related to clothing. Nowadays, there are lot of online shops available in the internet that offer wide varieties of apparels. The offline shops also offer many kinds of different clothing, because they now have many online suppliers. This make people have so many choices in choosing their outfits. This condition can lead to waste of money, because people tend to be dissatisfied by only shopping once.
Another example is about food. Lot of online delivery applications have existed in this internet-era. They compete each other to win customers, and will do anything to win. One online delivery application offers discounts for some merchants, while the other application offers for other merchants. This can lead to confusion, because people will no longer order foods that they want, but now they apt to order foods that are discounted.
So, in conclusion, I agree that people nowadays have too many choices. This condition can lead both to waste of money and also confusion. But again, everything is back to ourselves. It is about how we react to this condition. If we are wise enough, we can avoid those negative impacts caused by this condition.
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement 73
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 84
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 70
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1171.0 1615.20841683 72% => OK
No of words: 231.0 315.596192385 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06926406926 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62351234772 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580086580087 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 369.9 506.74238477 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.2975951904 59% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.3236785756 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 65.0555555556 106.682146367 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.8333333333 20.7667163134 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.55555555556 7.06120827912 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207168802708 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656478144954 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100855824595 0.0667982634062 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126972929592 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586753697003 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.0946893788 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.3 50.2224549098 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.24 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.1190380762 67% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.