The bar chart belw shows shares of expenditures for five major categories in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Japan in the year 2009.

Essay topics:

The bar chart belw shows shares of expenditures for five major categories in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Japan in the year 2009.

The chart compares the cost paid for five aspects, including food, housing, transportation, health care, and clothing in 6 nations, United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Japan in 2009.

Overall, while the percentage of cost spent on housing and food were the highest, compared to other expenditures, the payment for health care and clothing accounted for a minority of rate.

Look at the bar chart for more detail, it constituted 26% on housing in the United States, which was nearly twice as much as that of food, at 14%. The rate of expenditure on housing was relatively similar among four nations (United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Japan ), with 26%, 21%, 24%, 22% respectively. In terms of the cost spent on food, Japan topped the list with 23%, followed by the United Kingdom with 20%, and the last position belonged to the United States with 14%.

As can be seen in the chart, Canadian spend most income on transportation, with 20%. People in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Japan paid at lower rates, with 17%, 15%, and 10%, respectively. Surprisingly, It only cost below 7% for health care and clothing in all countries.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-11-19 tranthaolinh27052002 73 view
2019-08-23 Cherry06 67 view
2019-08-22 phanduydat 78 view
2019-08-18 lnmt2007 73 view
2019-07-22 Prabhjot Sanghera 91 view
Essays by user ubs3452 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 277, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...s, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Japan , with 26%, 21%, 24%, 22% respectively. I...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 973.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93908629442 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64015845928 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548223350254 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.482926829268 1242% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5539934904 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.625 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.625 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.375 5.23603664747 26% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357539192359 0.215688989381 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165511038053 0.103423049105 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116851769676 0.0843802449381 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230305941864 0.15604864568 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123408251857 0.0819641961636 151% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.