The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

The pie charts illustrate the proportions of three types of nutrients contained in common meals of American, which can be unhealthy if eaten excessively.

Overall, people in USA consume the largest percentages of Sodium and Saturated fat in Dinner, while Snacks include the largest proportion of Added Sugar. On the other hand, Breakfast is the meal that people consume the least amount of these three types of nutrients.

The greatest percentages of Sodium and Saturated fat were to be found in Dinner, which was followed by Lunch, in which each of these nutrients accounted for approximately 30%. Only 14% of Sodium consumed in Snacks and Breakfast, compared to 16% and 21% of Saturated in the same meals.

Snacks was the meal that includes the highest consumption of Added Sugar, with 42%, which was nearly double that of Dinner. Breakfast and Lunch had similar percentages of Added Sugar, ranging from 16% to 19%.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-09 ChristineNguyen 11 view
2019-12-19 YGGGG 11 view
2019-11-29 asdasdasd 78 view
2019-11-09 mohadeseyaghoobi72@gmail.com 73 view
2019-10-17 Pgreat 11 view
Essays by user vivukhue :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 775.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09868421053 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67658068088 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565789473684 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 223.2 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.4119231688 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.714285714 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57142857143 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156145463386 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.07753145194 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730724837251 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108831404281 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0702471426582 0.0819641961636 86% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.