Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems
To what extend do you agree or disagree?
The discourses regarding how to face a traffic growth and pollution is consider the most important issue throughout decades. I personally believe that making the oil cost expensive is not the best view to offer.
To start with, it is generally known that the number of privet transportation, i.e., car and motor bikes, continue to grow year after year resulting an inevitable serious traffic problems in many countries around the world. For instance, Jakarta, London, Mumbai, etc. Valorising the cost for oil seems not an answer to this phenomena. Since the country like Jakarta, although asked more fee for oil, yet unable to solve the traffic jam in the city. On the other hand, the region such as Dubai and Doha, having no attention to a traffic even if the oil is cheap there. Hence, price is not the one who to blame. Despite, the number of cars and motor bikes need to decrease.
In addition, it is clear that, the nation with a bunch of cars in their roads is considered the one who suffer most from pollution. This due to the fact that the gas produced by such medium of transportation put a great damage to the horizon. Again, reducing the number of transportation will decrease the amount of air pollution.
Some may argued that manufacture caused more damage to the environment. However the oil is not the case, instead the waste that produced by such industries is the one who damaging the earth most.
To sum up, asking more cost for transportation oil is not the real solution since many nations still unable to reduce traffic business in their roads. Despite, it can be solved simultaneously by decreasing cars and motor bikes in the city.
- The graph below shows the rate of smoking per 1000 people in Indonesia from 1960 to 2000 56
- New Parents should attend parenting classes to learn how to bring up their children well. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
- Some People think that getting a degree from university is the best way to guarantee a good job. Others believe that it would be better to go straight into works and get experience instead.Discuss both views and give your opinion! 78
- The graph bellow shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in United Kingdom in 1970, 1990 and 2000.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problemsTo what extend do you agree or disagree? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 72, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'considered'.
Suggestion: considered
... face a traffic growth and pollution is consider the most important issue throughout dec...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 319, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...the cost for oil seems not an answer to this phenomena. Since the country like Jakar...
^^^^
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'great damage'.
Suggestion: great damage
...ed by such medium of transportation put a great damage to the horizon. Again, reducing the num...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 72, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... caused more damage to the environment. However the oil is not the case, instead the wa...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, may, regarding, so, still, for instance, in addition, such as, to start with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1373.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76736111111 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64076824526 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569444444444 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9946285784 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.8125 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0822367749097 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0252814234364 0.084324248473 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0274455832337 0.0667982634062 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0429049197912 0.151304729494 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373601619794 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.09 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.