The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household.
Environmental degradation is the biggest concern of our times as it presents a very hellish future with increasing pollution, extinction of flora and fauna and depleting ground water. It needs immediate and strict addressal by all individuals across the globe. Consumer-generated waste is one of the important factors causing environmental problems and something needs to be done to regulate this, but I don't believe that imposing a strict limit on the amount of trash that would be accepted from each household is the right solution for that. Households will continue to generate trash and if there are limits on trash collection, they will find some other devious ways to dispose off the trash. Like adding self's trash in neighbour's, throw off extra trash in nearby waste lands or water bodies or anonymously litter in public places etc. Such measures will only create more nusance, promote ill-will among the people and is a non-sustainable solution.
The right way to tackle the problem of consumer-generated trash would be addressing the root cause of the problem through a behaviour change in the people which is possible only through increased awareness on the criticality of the issue and educating them how to collectively work towards environmental degradation. Encouraging environmental habits like reduced use of plastics, ways to reduce household trash, recycling organic waste to form manure for plants and separating organic and inorganic wastes at home would be more beneficial. There should be strict rules around implementing these practices like making it mandatory for all retail stores and hawkers to use cloth or paper bags instead of plastic bags and charge extra for them or restaurants to use extra chargeable wooden cutlery instead of plastic ones. Such measures will aide in bringing the desired behaviour change in people like carrying their own bags to the market or using own utensils thereby, organically reducing trash generation. Other measures that are prevalent these days is housing societies providing each house a red and a green dustbin for inorganic and organic waste respectively.
Further, government should incentivize local bodies to take initiatives for recycling trash and maybe organize weekend workshops and drives for the public to participate. This would not only increase the awareness but would also serve as a platform to educate them on environment friendly practices. School's curriculum should also cover these practices as present kids are the future of tomorrow who should be aware of the consequences of not acting righteously on this matter now.
The solution to this alarming environmental problem lies in implementing a long-term sustainable solution which is behaviour change of the citizens and not just limiting the trash collected from each household.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-19 | Juhong Park | 10 | view |
| 2023-10-19 | Juhong Park | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | Juhong Park | 83 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | Juhong Park | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | Juhong Park | 66 | view |
- The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household. 75
- The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens. 75
- Some people claim that the goal of politics should be the pursuit of an ideal. Others argue that the goal should be finding common ground and reaching reasonable consensus. 66
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear. 83
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field. 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 405, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...eeds to be done to regulate this, but I dont believe that imposing a strict limit on...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2386.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 442.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39819004525 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97220321193 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549773755656 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 746.1 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.0789096869 60.3974514979 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.066666667 118.986275619 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.4666666667 23.4991977007 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.46666666667 5.21951772744 28% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347174064643 0.243740707755 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107092743422 0.0831039109588 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108391475057 0.0758088955206 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201740060161 0.150359130593 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127629621398 0.0667264976115 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 14.1392134831 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 48.8420337079 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.1743820225 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.1639044944 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.38706741573 113% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 100.480337079 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.