The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart gives information about the percentage change in average house prices in five different cities located in five different countries over 12 year period between 1990 and 2002 compared with average house prices in 1989.
According to the chart, during the period from 1990 to 1995 the average prices from houses in 3 cities decreased significantly by five percent in New York(USA) and about 7.5 percent in both Tokyo(Japan)and London (UK) while the average house prices increased slightly ib two cities Madrid(Spain) and Frankfurt (Germany) by about 1.5 percent and 2 percent respectively.
As far as the next period (1996-2002) is concerned, it is clear that the average house prices decreased only in Tokyo(Japan)by 5 percent. In contrast the average house prices increased in the rest of cities. In New York it is increased considerably by 5 percent, in Madrid it is increased slightly by 4 percent, in Frankfurt it is increased by 2 percent.
London has the largest increase in the average house price over the 6 year period from 1996-2002 as it increased dramatically by 11 percent.
All in all, there are a wide differences in house prices between the five cities which illustrated in this chart. These differences may be a result of the number of population or the number of houses required in a certain city.
- The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town. 61
- The pie chart below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Both the poor and the rich find the accessibility into University difficult. Do you agree or disagree. 78
- Ielts 7 test 2 writing task1 The graph below shows consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 68
- The pie chart below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 24, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ices in 1989. According to the chart, during the period from 1990 to 1995 the ...
^^
Line 5, column 36, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... As far as the next period 1996-2002 is concerned, it is clear that the aver...
^^
Line 5, column 51, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the next period 1996-2002 is concerned, it is clear that the average house price...
^^
Line 5, column 140, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...ased only in TokyoJapanby 5 percent. In contrast the average house prices increased in t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 12, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...matically by 11 percent. All in all, there are a wide differences in house pr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1101.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98190045249 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85088701387 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484162895928 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 336.6 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 84.9437313755 43.030603864 197% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.625 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.625 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.424080555454 0.215688989381 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.217967171825 0.103423049105 211% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.167626978788 0.0843802449381 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276828083316 0.15604864568 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.16747843578 0.0819641961636 204% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.