Some employers want to be able to contact their staff at all times, even on holidays. Does this development have more disadvantages than advantages?
Technology is improving the way of communication and many organizations want to take the benefit of this advancement to bridge the gaps of connectivity between employees. It is believed by some managers that they should be able to contact their staff every moment they want to. In my opinion, this development has more benefits as compared with drawbacks.
On one positive side, some employees being accessible have many considerable advantages which are vital for the society. For instance, medical or nursing professionals should always be ready to attend to the emergencies that occur in order to save people's life regardless of holidays. In this case, the main advantage is they could play an important role in saving lives. Another benefit of working on holidays for the employees is that they get paid for their work or overtime, resulting in contribute monthly income of the workers. Furthermore, when a service agent or sales representative is unable to be contacted for costumer's inquires, it is likely that costumers will become unsatisfied and subsequently discouraged. For this mentioned reason, it is said that keeping constant contact could improve costumer service's quality
On the negative side, the personal life of an employee is affected as the employee has to dedicate more time to his job. Contacting employees all the time can hinder their private life and other activities. This sometimes results in a stressful life and frustration with the company. In the majority of the cases, employees prefer to shift their jobs because of the inability to handle the pressure of presence all the time. A survey revealed that the persuading employees to be present all-time for an organization has adverse impacts on their family life balance.
In conclusion, despite negative impacts on the family and social culture, I believe that contacting employees all the time has more advantages for the organization as well as for the employee.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-07-27 | bhatvishal@ | 89 | view |
2019-07-27 | bhatvishal@ | 84 | view |
2019-07-27 | bhatvishal@ | 73 | view |
2019-07-27 | bhatvishal@ | 73 | view |
2019-02-08 | pooyanfaizian | 61 | view |
- Some employers for their employees subsidized membership of gyms and sports clubs, believing that this will make their staff healthier and thus more effective at work. Other employers see no benefit in doing so. Consider the arguments from both aspects of 61
- The role of education is to prepare children for the modern world. School should cut art and music out of the curriculum so that children can focus on useful subjects such as information technology. To what extent do you agree? 73
- You play a team sport with some friends. Last week a member of the team had an accident and wasn't able to play with you at the weekend. You decide to write to him in hospital, telling him about the match.Write a letter to your friend. In your letter 73
- Every year more and more students choose to study online rather than attend classes on campus. Why are students choosing to study online? What can universities do to attract students back to campus? 73
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like.Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views an 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, well, as for, as to, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1645.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23885350318 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9444754881 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56050955414 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8865325949 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.5 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21428571429 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23850860325 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0868220095588 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501530272081 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147952744981 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0537190323662 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.