The line below shows the land used for organic crops in two countries between 1985 to 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons
The chart below illustrates the area to reproduce organic food, compared with 2 countries from 1985 to 2010.
It is clear in the chart that both countries had the nearly equal amount of land at 2010, with more than 100 thousand hectares.
At the year of 1985, country A and country B shared a same start point. Just after 5 years, the first country saw some slight improvements, around half a hundred thousands at 1990. In contrast, the remaining country had its land stabilized until 1995. At this year, the 100 thousand hectares mark was surpassed by 2 countries.
To the next period of 5 years, country B experienced a heavy leap, even really close to the mark of 300 thousands. That was almost double compared to the last 5 years of its own and the remaining country at that same time. However, the year of 2010 observed a sharp fall in terms of area mass by country B, with a loss of more than 200 thousand hectares of land. Meanwhile, the other one suffered some small oscillations, but still couldn't reach the mark of 200 thousand hectares.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-28 | nguyendynamo | 67 | view |
- The charts below show the main methods of transportation for people travelling to one university for work or study in 2004 and 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
- The line below shows the land used for organic crops in two countries between 1985 to 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 89
- The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The graph below shows the population for India and China since the year 2000 and predicts population growth until 2050. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 433, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...ered some small oscillations, but still couldnt reach the mark of 200 thousand hectares...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, really, so, still, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 869.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62234042553 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52472495129 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585106382979 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.8177562438 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.9 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140144494788 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0641799027194 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540106235524 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107614300585 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432341102703 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 87.05 61.2550243902 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.55 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.