Some people think that it is important to have a single language as an international official language. Others think that it will make it difficult to identify countries and would cause a loss of culture.
What are your opinions on this?
Few people nowadays would deny the importance of foreign languages, but at the same time, no doubt, that the learning process takes a lot of time. Considering the contradictions of the situation, some individuals suppose that having one official language on the planet would be beneficial for the mankind, while others set arguments in favor of preserving the linguistic diversity. I personally think that both opinions are worth attention, but keeping a variety of languages as a part of human culture must be a priority.
On the one hand, it is often discussed that narrowing the amount of dialects can ease the process of communication. For example, the speaking system of the Republic of China includes a great number of accents and dialects, which leads to misunderstanding of people from different regions. In this case, developing one authorized writing practice, called Mandarin, was a wise decision on behalf of the government. More than that, one commonly accepted language would prevent from studying others, which can save a lot of time and energy. In other words, depending on the situation, the idea of keeping one language can be taken into account, if there is an urgent need for this.
On the other hand, the reduction of the number of languages will certainly destroy our cultural heritage. Thereafter, with a loss of culture comes a loss of the way of life that should be protected properly. What is more, preserving a native tongue is the first key for younger generations for further education and understanding their lifestyle. Knowing foreign languages makes a person educated and well-rounded, which are essential qualities especially in the modern developing world. All in all, language is a portrait of a nation, and in order to protect it for the future, people should try to treat it respectfully.
In conclusion, I am inclined to think that both mentioned views can become of great importance, provided that humans value their cultures and languages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-05 | vanphu615 | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-04 | Faramarz Abbasi | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-29 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 89 | view |
| 2017-05-01 | grahamoneil | 73 | view |
| 2017-05-01 | grahamoneil | 73 | view |
- Technology provides us a lot of means to communicate But now that people have the ability to talk to each other in a wider variety of methods our communication and social abilities have taken a step back Why does technological advance hurt nontechnical co 97
- More and more companies are allowing employees to work at home Do you think this is a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your experience 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People should read only those books that are about real events real people and established facts Use specific reasons and details to support your opinion 80
- You exercise regularly and have been a member of many different gyms Recently you moved into a new neighbourhood and joined a new gym You have noticed that people at this gym do not bother to wipe down the machines after use and often leave dirty towels o 79
- The table below shows the figures (in thousand) for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, in other words, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1661.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12654320988 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96045901142 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592592592593 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.6547865291 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.642857143 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1428571429 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198847319954 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0594410093064 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.036389856702 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107230495584 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051442804143 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.