Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.
Author’s claim “Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, time, and place”, in my opinion depends on the law. Laws are made so that it can allow people to behave in order and to maintain harmony and peace among people as well as nation. Some might argue that laws should be firm to bring some effectiveness as people in current scenario because of greed take several illicit action and not changing laws in order to remain in power might call forth more corruption in nation, whereas change is constant and laws which were made in past might not hold any worth today, thus amendments needed to made according to changes.
Laws needed to be stringent as many laws are set up by international bodies and every country need to abide with those laws. Consider and example, laws regarding the use of nuclear power should be followed by each and every country to assert harmony and peace among country as nuclear power can cause great destruction. We have example of Japan in world war II at our disposition. Due to use of atomic bomb, japan had faced severe destruction. Thus there are several laws that should not be flexible enough and each and every body need to follow it.
Not only international laws, there are certain other laws which should not be amended in lest of losing of powers. India is trying very hard to become a developed country but in my opinion what occludes India is corruption. In order to satiate the greed, people uses wrong means to achieve their goals and official body also became complicit in such action in order to be in power. Thus, changing laws in order to be in power, might generate spite among people and might further polarizes people in two group: rich and poor. Thus, laws to be enforced equally to each and every person to maintain unity.
However, Change is constant and laws made in past might contradict the current situation, in such case amendments of law needed to be made. Consider for example, in past homosexuality was considered as taboo, whereas in current scenario, people are being open to talk about such issues and people are accepting it. Consider another example, In past government had restricted merchants to free trading in order to uplift the small-scale industry and public sector. This laws might not hold valid today.
In wrapping up, Law behavior depends on the type of laws, there are certain laws that should not be flexible as to ascertain code of conduct of nations, whereas due to change in current situation, some laws needed to be amended to maintain peace and harmony in nation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | jason123 | 79 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | jason123 | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | samruddh_shah | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | samruddh_shah | 16 | view |
| 2019-12-10 | p30kh40 | 50 | view |
- In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field. 50
- The main benefit of the study of history is to dispel the illusion that people living now are significantly different from people who lived in earlier times 68
- Luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals 83
- All to often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary 66
- The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things. 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 408, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... disposition. Due to use of atomic bomb, japan had faced severe destruction. Thus...
^^
Line 3, column 446, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...b, japan had faced severe destruction. Thus there are several laws that should not ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, regarding, so, thus, well, whereas, as to, for example, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 82.0 58.6224719101 140% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2159.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 448.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81919642857 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48027835773 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470982142857 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 676.8 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.2481806675 60.3974514979 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.944444444 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8888888889 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 5.21951772744 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298667379955 0.243740707755 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101984459739 0.0831039109588 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105893920017 0.0758088955206 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181766846673 0.150359130593 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0729809810458 0.0667264976115 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.8971910112 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.