Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
What other measures do you think might be effective?
As the traffic and pollution problems are becoming more serious in today’s society, many people argue that rising the costs of fuels is the best solution for this issue. However, personally I disagree with this idea, and I believe that the government should encourage citizens to use public transport.
While it is undeniable that major cause of the increase in traffic and pollution is the use of private vehicles, higher price of petrol would have little effect on solving the problems. Even though the costs of fuels are much higher, people still prefer travelling on their own vehicles due to its convenience and flexibility compared to other means of transport. For example, during the last ten years, although the Vietnamese government has raised the fuels price to more than fivefold aiming to eliminate the use of private vehicles and protect the environment, the number of cars and motorbikes is still increasing dramatically, and the air is even more polluted. Clearly, the costs of petrol is not the answer to the issue.
To tackle the problems, the use of public transportation should be encouraged by improving the quality of this system. Public transit such as buses or trains is more environment-friendly since they can accommodate many passengers at once, leading to the decrease in the number of private vehicles running on the roads, and the exhaust fumes per capita. Therefore, governments should build more sky and underground train systems and upgrade the quality of bus services in order to attract more passengers. An example is Singapore; since the network of public transport in this country such as trains, buses and subways are highly developed, the citizens can enjoy extremely clean and fresh air and less chaotic/ chronic traffic problems.
In conclusion, I believe that the price of fuels plays no role in eliminating the traffic and pollution issue and that the use of public transport and alternative fuels should be seriously considered.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-02 | happyhappy | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-17 | julieehung | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | Chi Hoang | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-13 | Chi Hoang | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-30 | ghikar | 78 | view |
- The plans below show a student room for two students and a student room for one student at an Australian university 73
- The diagram below show the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950. 78
- Some people think that newspapers are the best way to get news. However, others believe that they can get news better through other media.Discuss both views and give your opinion? 78
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010. 84
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 63
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, still, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1665.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18691588785 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85300433544 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532710280374 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.1352829593 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.363636364 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1818181818 20.7667163134 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63636363636 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116048971497 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0502366942441 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522856385826 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0752106405845 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313242951409 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.