The bar graph shows percentage growth in average property prices in three different countries between 2007 and 2010.

Essay topics:

The bar graph shows percentage growth in average property prices in three different countries between 2007 and 2010.

The bar chart illustrated the proportion growth in average asset values of Argentina, china, and Algeria during the period of 2007 to 2010.
Overall, china experienced significant increase while Algeria underwent a considerable decrease of the growth. In comparison, there was a fluctuation of Argentina's percentage over 4 years.
when it comes to the upward trend, the rate of property prices of china sharply rose from 2% in the beginning year to over 6% as 2 times as the rest in the final year.
when it comes to the downward trend, Argentina's asset significantly dropped by 2 times over 3 years which accounted for 6.2% to 3.1% in 2009 before slightly decreased to 3% in 2010. On the other hand, the proportion of asset in Argentina was topped from 3% in 2007 to reach a peak at 4.5% in 2008 that year they were by far the highest-rated in development. Subsequently, the figure declined straightly to 1.2% in 2009 before reaching to 2.3% in 2010.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-17 Nguyen Manh Dung 56 view
2019-12-13 Nguyen Manh Dung 89 view
2019-11-22 jenmin 61 view
2019-08-02 harvle 78 view
2019-06-16 Võ Ngân 61 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 141, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eria during the period of 2007 to 2010. Overall, china experienced significant i...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...f Argentinas percentage over 4 years. when it comes to the upward trend, the rate ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
... times as the rest in the final year. when it comes to the downward trend, Argent...
^^^^
Line 4, column 37, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... when it comes to the downward trend, Argentinas asset significantly dropped b...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, as to, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 794.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81212121212 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9158003436 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606060606061 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9164463424 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.428571429 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5714285714 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148225301442 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692759046904 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0587216958162 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0995052856254 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0642983516584 0.0819641961636 78% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.