SOME COUNTRIES ACHIEVE INTERNATIONAL SPORTING SUCCESS BY BUILDING SPECIALIZED FACILITY TO TRAIN TOP ATHLETES INSTEAD OF PROVIDING SPORT FACILITY THAT EVERYONE CAN USE. DO U THINK IT’S NEGATIVE/POSITIVE DEVELOPMENT?
In the era of relentless competitiveness, preparing stellar athletes with satisfactory accommodations and other equipment is becoming critical for any nations. Nonetheless, some of them do not sufficiently deliver best facilities to the ordinary citizens. In my opinion, this trend should be supported and propelled owing to several reasons
To begin with, vigorously economic countries are recommended to provide élite Olympic participants with desirable prerogatives on account of its long-term benefits. The more heavily invested the contestants are, the more experience they may acquire when participating in special training sessions with world-class experts. This can be the immeasurable advantage to the athletes to attain appreciated achievements, hence bringing tremendous prizes and money to invest in the junior classes eventually enhancing the national stature. Furthermore, the retired yet passionate top athletes can collaborate with developing sporting academy with a view to coaching youngsters who are keen on professional sports and creating a new competitive generation in the future.
That is not to say this growing trend does not have any negative impact on the sporting industry in those oriented-invested nations. Since most inhabitants do not have adequate standardized sporting equipment, they will have less opportunity to elevate their skills quickly, hence being restrained at a certain level. Besides, that desirable attainment mostly comes to the privileged people may discourage the public to do sports frequently, thus preventing them from having a good health.
In conclusion, in order to obtain fruitful results ultimately, countries in the world are suggested to continue facilitate the specialized development of top athletes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-04 | lonbimthoi | 67 | view |
- Some people hold that nature places a more important role in people development. However, others believe nurture is the decisive factor. Discuss both views, give opinions. 90
- SOME PEOPLE THINK IT’S NECESSARY TO TRAVEL ABROAD TO LEARN ABOUT OTHER COUNTRIES. HOWEVER, OTHER THINK IT’S NOT NECESSARY TO TRAVEL ABROAD BECAUSE ALL OF THE INFORMATION CAN BE SEEN ON TV AND THE INTERNET. DISCUSS BOTH VIEW, OPINION? 100
- SOME PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT WOMEN SHOULD PLAY AN EQUAL ROLE AS MEN IN COUNTRY’S POLICE OR MILITARY FORCES. OTHERS THINK WOMEN ARE NOT SUITABLE FOR THESE KIND OF JOBS. DISCUSS BOTH VIEWS AND GIVE OPINION? 84
- SOME PEOPLE ARGUE THAT COUNTRIES SHOULD HAVE A MORAL OBLIGATION TO HELP EACH OTHER. ON THE OTHER HAND, SOME PEOPLE THINK THAT A LARGE NUMBER OF AID MONEY DOESN’T REACH THE POOR OF THE WORLD. DISCUSS BOTH VIEW, OPINION? 89
- Global environmental issues are the responsibility of rich nations, not of poorer nations. Do you agree with this opinion? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 207, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'deliver the best'.
Suggestion: deliver the best
...eless, some of them do not sufficiently deliver best facilities to the ordinary citizens. In...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 341, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d and propelled owing to several reasons To begin with, vigorously economic count...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... competitive generation in the future. That is not to say this growing trend do...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, hence, may, nonetheless, so, thus, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1520.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.9375 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31691002137 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6796875 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.8547602889 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.0 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214614346765 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0755440376516 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434914481254 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109548053426 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0206406300079 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.3 13.0946893788 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 20.72 50.2224549098 41% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.47 12.4159519038 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.17 8.58950901804 130% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.