Some believe that people who do physical work should be paid on par with the people who have high level degree. Do you agree or disagree?
Some people argue that the income distribution should be based on amount of physical activity involved in a job rather than giving preference to education level. I disagree with the above argument and this essay will elaborate upon my disagreement; followed by a reasoned conclusion.
To begin with, amount paid for a work should be directly proportional to the value addition. Around the organizations, blue-collar jobs are associated with high physical activities and white-collar jobs are linked to more mental work. Additionally, blue-collar jobs are guided and managed by people who make management or administrative decisions. Consequently, people who lay the roadmaps and take decisions are paid higher than the people who implement them.
However, not all jobs involving a lot of physical tasks are lesser paid. For example, Athletes are paid millions to represent their clubs or country. On the contrary, farmers and factory workers are paid minimal income to be limited to bread and butter only. Many of these workers live in a shambolic state and often treated as second-class citizens. Although It’s the prerogative of the government to bring minimum income programs to avoid exploitation of workers, their salaries, however, cannot be compared to people who earn their positions. Moreover, Individuals who earn educational degrees should get rewarded with higher salaries to encourage others towards education.
To conclude, societies have different pay structures depending upon the stature of a job. The pay gap is not determined by the amount of physical work but by the quantum of results that the work adds to the progress of an organization. Therefore, the people in the higher ranks will always be paid high as they draw policies that affect the direction of the organization.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-15 | shalomis101@gmail.com | 22 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | camp.vandna@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-08 | Bhawna Sharma | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-22 | gk | 78 | view |
- Some people think that they can be encouraged through sporting events like olympics Others think that there are more better ways to encourage adults for exercise Discuss both and give your opinion 84
- You live in an English speaking country and you want to do some voluntary, unpaid work in a developing country. Write a letter to a company called Cultural Expeditions, which organizes such trips. In your letter:•Explain why you want to do the voluntary 78
- With internet improvements, people can share views or opinions on certain goods or services that they have purchased. Is this a good or a bad thing? Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- A friend has offered you some work in his company You are currently employed and not able to start for 3 months Write a reply to your friend In your letter give details of what you know about his company explain your current situation give your answer to 76
- More and more developing countries are expanding their tourist industries. Why is this? Is it a positive development? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, for example, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36267605634 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00423517427 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595070422535 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0604832928 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.533333333 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340269527569 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0994121127873 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638279041577 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194266210997 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554218313435 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.