This tables show data about the amount of television watched by children in different countries (hours per day ) and also the average academic achievement of people in these countries (% of people completing each level .)
The given tables evince us some information about the number hours of watching TV in each day by young people, and the medium academic accomplishment in miscellaneous countries.
Turning to the number hours of watching TV per day, the USA, the UK and Canada have the highest amount, with 4. For Each of countries of China and Italy, it is 3, standing at 2 in India and Brazil. The UAE and Malta have the minimum number, 1 hours/day, which is a quarter of the maximum recorded.
According to table 2, we can see that the average percentage of people with academic achievement is categorized in three subdivision: school, high school, and university. By augmentation of education, this average decreases. From school to high school, this dives less than 10 unites in UK, Malta, UAE, Canada, Brazil, Italy and USA, dwindling 20% in India, slumping more than precedent percentage in China. This experiences huge drop from high school to university. It dips less than one-third in China, USA, Italy and UK, pluming a little more than one-third in Canada, sliding down more than a quarter in Brazil and UAE. In Malta and India, this tails off around 20%.
In summary, it seems countries have more watching television hours/day, having more people completed university (except India).
- some people think that it is better to get information or advice from other people, while others believe that one can get information from the internet or books. discuss both views and give your own opinion. 89
- Some people think having more TV channels is good because they will have more choices While other people think too many TV channels only lead to a lot of poor quality TV programs Discuss both views and give your opinion Give reasons for your answer and in 78
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected personal relationships Has this become a positive or negative development 84
- nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants. why do you think people waste food? what can be done to reduce the amount of food that throw away.
- The first graph shows the reasons for studying in the UK by age, while the second graph shows the support given by employers for training by age. 100
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, third, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1075.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02336448598 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74835088993 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584112149533 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 324.9 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 1.53170731707 522% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.7705032112 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7272727273 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4545454545 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.90909090909 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242833682712 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0951937616817 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0701073617742 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166631980468 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534947027014 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.