The house prices is higher in many countries. What are the effects of higher prices to individuals and society? What is the best way for people to deal with this problem?
There is a vigorous growth in the living cost nationwide which poses a serious threat to the quality of people’s lives and the sustainable development of community. I strongly believe that the authorities should find out the prime reasons before some optimal measures to tackle this concerning issue.
It is comprehensible that there are numerous effects of this circumstance. First of all, the most significant problem associated with income of residents was higher than in previous years and they are capable of buying pricey accommodations, which leads to the unevenness of the house price. As a result, the low-income person will be vulnerable due to the huge gap between rich and poor in this field. Secondly, if the politicians find it hard to determine the standard home prices, it will wreck the national economy such as the recession of housing market. The boom of real estate prices in New York perfectly exemplifies this situation, based on the mass migration of citizens around the world to America, the real property rocketed compared to before.
Several viable solutions can be implemented to mitigate the aforementioned issues. On the government level, they should issue some permanent laws to sustain the floor price of accommodations to curb the unfair competitive practices. In order to holistically address these problem, I believe that this drastic measures are needed because it not only advocate people expose to cheap real estate but the authorities also suppress money laundering situation. Additionally, on the personal level, citizens are responsible for broadening their perceptions to diminishing the dumping. For instance, many research proved that people exaggerate the house values illegally can interfere with the stability.
To conclude, the higher prices can lead to a host of detrimental effects to both indigenous residents and government management. I completely believe that they must take the proposed solutions which facilitate a better quality of life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-22 | hainguyendl | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-22 | Ngoc Khanh Ong | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-11 | phanduydat | 89 | view |
- It is more important to spend public money promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on the treatment of people who are already ill. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- In many countries, a small number of people earn extremely high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country, but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level.Discuss both these views and give your own o 73
- Some children can learn more efficiently by watching tv. Therefore, children should watch tv regularly both in school and at home? Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Task 2: The availability of entertainment such as video games on handheld devices are harmful to individual and to the society they live in. To what extent do you agree and disagree? 84
- Competitiveness is a positive quality for people in most societies. How does competitiveness affect individuals? Is it a positive or negative trend? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 267, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this problem' or 'these problems'?
Suggestion: this problem; these problems
...tices. In order to holistically address these problem, I believe that this drastic measures a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 593, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun research seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much research', 'a good deal of research'.
Suggestion: much research; a good deal of research
... diminishing the dumping. For instance, many research proved that people exaggerate the house...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, for instance, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1705.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48231511254 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03551283112 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620578778135 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2149203739 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.785714286 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2142857143 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220764164873 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0641588553416 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567355216324 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115111890033 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505684046121 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.