Some people prefer to live in small family units, while other think it is better to live in large family groups. Discuss both views and give your opinions.

Essay topics:

Some people prefer to live in small family units, while other think it is better to live in large family groups. Discuss both views and give your opinions.

People have different views about which type of family is better. While living in a nuclear family is beneficial to some extent, I would argue that the advantages of living in an extended family are greater.
On the one hand, living in a nuclear family has some benefits. Firstly, since a small family unit consists of parents and children, there are fewer conflicts caused by the generation gap. If people live in multiple generation families, they might usually have arguments with other members about some problems such as finance or methods for educating children. Moreover, living in a nuclear family enables individuals to have more private time to do whatever they want. As a result, they might feel more comfortable at home.
On the other hand, there are several reasons why individuals should live in large family groups . First of all, because there are many members in an extended family, they can easily help each other when necessary. For example, grandparents can assist busy parents in looking after their children. If these parents live in a small family, they might have to employ a babysitter to take care of their offsprings. In addition, living under one roof allows people to share many things with each other such as doing the houshold chores together or asking for advice when having trouble. This might consolidate the close - knit relationship among family members.
In conlusion, while there are some advantages of having a small family unit, I believe that choosing to live in an extended family is a better option.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-08-11 dtth045 56 view
2019-05-21 trunghn 56 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 96, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...duals should live in large family groups . First of all, because there are many me...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, look, moreover, so, while, for example, in addition, such as, as a result, first of all, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1289.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01556420233 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51577512733 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556420233463 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6221819068 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0714285714 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3571428571 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352391516422 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135700030113 0.084324248473 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100817103672 0.0667982634062 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.268652144237 0.151304729494 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0754254072765 0.056905535591 133% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.