Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Scandals have been a part of almost every field. They involve illegal and aberrant behaviour of the people which is not endorse in the society. People give different reaction with different topics. Scandals attained everyone focus on the main issue.
It is correct that we learn with mistakes. Every person is wiser and progmatic with their own experiences. No one will learn or concentrate with a speaker untill anything will not happen with their own experience. So learning takes place more difficult with those people. If you have a problem and you have a permanent solution to that problem, you will not learn anything from that you will do it again and again. And if a problam that you faced have not any permanent solution and you intimidated by the people for that problem for long time and you will never for forget it and you have to face people in future that some problem definately learns you a lesson.
Speaker and reformer also do this work. They tries to learn people with discussing the existing problems and their experience in some events. It is human nature to give more importance to the existing problems rather than prepare for a problem that you might face in future. But it is not a right way to learn because Cure is always better than prevention.
Scandals and existing problems are useful for us in a way since they help in focusing our attention more towards the problem and its solution. But for finding a solution there are a large number of people, it cannot be taken place without a majority of the people. A leader won't be able to find out a permanent solution for a problem. therefore, it depends on the society that how they took as a whole for a scandals as a common problem. Good values and good morals are needed for a society. Change in thinking can change everything.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 121, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'endorsed'.
Suggestion: endorsed
...nt behaviour of the people which is not endorse in the society. People give different r...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ncentrate with a speaker untill anything will not happen with their own experienc...
^^
Line 5, column 46, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'They' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'try'
Suggestion: try
...er and reformer also do this work. They tries to learn people with discussing the exi...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 61, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to people'
Suggestion: to people
... also do this work. They tries to learn people with discussing the existing problems a...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 265, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...epare for a problem that you might face in future. But it is not a right way to learn bec...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 181, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...n. But for finding a solution there are a large number of people, it cannot be taken place withou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 337, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...out a permanent solution for a problem. therefore, it depends on the society that how the...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 408, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a scandal' or simply 'scandals'?
Suggestion: a scandal; scandals
...ciety that how they took as a whole for a scandals as a common problem. Good values and go...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 58.6224719101 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1497.0 2235.4752809 67% => OK
No of words: 321.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66355140187 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44512369131 2.79657885939 87% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 215.323595506 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498442367601 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 704.065955056 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.8219580105 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.85 118.986275619 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.05 23.4991977007 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.4 5.21951772744 27% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 5.13820224719 253% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271176708187 0.243740707755 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0730411638948 0.0831039109588 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542965205602 0.0758088955206 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15115002936 0.150359130593 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0265778037094 0.0667264976115 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 14.1392134831 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.8420337079 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.45 12.1639044944 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 100.480337079 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 11.8971910112 38% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.