The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph illustrates that the comparison of pollution levels which it was made by sulphur dioxide and smoke in London from 1600 to 2000. Overall, most of pollution throughout 1600 to 2000 was produced by sulphur dioxide, while smoke is the undermost.
Furthermore, the highest pollution level which was contributed by sulphur dioxide occurred in 1750s and during 1800 to 1900s which it attained more than 750 micrograms per cubic meters. throughout 1600 to 1700s the number of sulphur dioxide pollutions gravitate to escalate extremely which it added more than 700s micrograms per cubic meters, while since 1600 to 1900 the number of smoke pollution tend to increase slightly which it just reached less than 250 micrograms per cubic meters.
In contrast, throughout 1990s to 2000s the number of pollution levels which it were implicated by sulphur dioxide and smoke factors lean to slipped tremendously, up to 0 micrograms per cubic meters.
- The diagram below shows the number of houses built per year in two cities, Derby and Nottingham, Between 2000 and 2009. 73
- The graph below shows the fertility rate of women in different Gulf Countries from 1990 to 2000. 67
- not so many people use a bicycle although it has many benefits. Why? How to encourage people to use bicycles as a main transport 56
- Organized tours to remote areas and community are becoming more and more popular. Is this a positive or negative development for local people and the environment? 73
- In many countries today insufficient respect is shown to older people.What do you think may be the reasons for this?What problems might this cause in society? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 187, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Throughout
...e than 750 micrograms per cubic meters. throughout 1600 to 1700s the number of sulphur dio...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 796.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23684210526 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6960523105 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 78.0 106.607317073 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513157894737 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 221.4 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.3084986813 43.030603864 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.2 112.824112599 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.4 22.9334400587 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138516421233 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107539358951 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0811951316768 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115640769543 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0787642588232 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.2329268293 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.