Should the government advocate development at the cost of demolishing historic buildings? Absolutely not! Even thought some may concur that it is essential to replace them with modern buildings, another school of thought have completely opposing views. In my opinion, history should be cherished rather than destroyed and the same shall be analyzed in this essay.
To begin with, historic buildings are the final thread of connection to our rich and varied history. They remind us of the struggles and efforts undertaken by our ancestors to safeguard the people and preserve the culture. Secondly, many buildings have an ancient construction, particularly the colonial structures, which are very rare to witness these day. Hence, these have been converted into local attractions that attract countless of tourists and generates income for the government. For example, the Taj Mahal, which is an important structure in Indian history, is frequented by many and is also considered to be one of the major contributors to the tourism industry. If we demolish these structures to build modern buildings, there will be serious repercussions.
Similarly, these historic buildings are considered to be a symbol of pride. Instead of breaking them down, the government should make efforts to restore them to their former glory. Although, due to the housing problem it is vital to build modern buildings, but that cannot be achieved by compromising historic buildings. For instance, in India many significantly important buildings were broken down to pave the way for new constructions, however, the housing problems still persists and remains unresolved. Therefore, the government should in evidently adopt alternative approach rather than just ruthlessly tearing down historic structures.
In conclusion, I believe historic buildings should be preserved since they are a reminder of the history and also enhances tourism that contributes to the economy. Furthermore, the government should maintain them as they are a symbol of gratification for the country.
- You recently bought a piece of equipment for you kitchen but it did not work. You phoned the shop but no action was taken.Write a letter to the shop manager. In your letter:describe the problem with the equipment.explain what happened when you phoned the 87
- A large company in your area has decided to spend a certain amount of money, either to sponsor a local children’s sports team for two years, or to pay for two open-air concerts. It has asked for feedback from the general public.Write a letter to the com 73
- You would like to participate in a work-related seminar in another country.Write a letter to the person in charge of the seminar and ask for detailed information regarding the dates, program, accommodation and cost. 91
- While studying some students take weekend or evening jobs to help with expenditure. How do you feel about this? What are the drawbacks and benefits of such a decision? 78
- Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets there is no need to go to cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed, films need to be seen in cinema.Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 348, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this day' or 'these days'?
Suggestion: this day; these days
...uctures, which are very rare to witness these day. Hence, these have been converted into ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, similarly, so, still, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1744.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55414012739 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02559168408 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585987261146 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4420155816 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.625 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304866518804 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0991132860554 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678775307224 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186439892231 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0695103067534 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.