The bar chart below shows shares of expenditures for five major categories in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Japan in the year 2009.
The bar chart depicts the annual utilisations on five types of commodities, namely food, housing, transportation, healthcare and clothing in the group of six typical countries the USA, Canada, the UK and Japan in 2009.
Overall, as can be inferred from the data, there was an overwhelming figure for food, housing and transportation in nations, which contradicted the lower tendency in the group of health care and clothing.
Looking at the graph, food consumption in japan witnessed a significant percentage in four great nations worldwide, in the vicinity of 23% and United Kingdom was deemed the second highest in this field exactly 20%. Likewise, Canada and the USA were respectively the two countries with the least amount of food products. Additionally, United States and United Kingdom were the two highest groups in housing over the course at about 26% and 24% respectively. Transportation observed a substantial proportion of vehicles in Canada and it twice as much as Japan.
In contrast, the market share of health care was negligible while the proportion of USA (7%) exceeded that of United Kingdom (2%). In term of clothing, the figure for Japan mirrored the US approximately 4% and it lower than both Canada and United Kingdom about 3%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-19 | tranthaolinh27052002 | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-23 | Cherry06 | 67 | view |
| 2019-08-22 | phanduydat | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-18 | lnmt2007 | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-22 | Prabhjot Sanghera | 91 | view |
- The line graph shows visits to and from the UK from 1979 to 1999, and the bar graph shows the most popular countries visited by UK residents in 1999.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- These days it is very common to have people from two different generations mix in the same workplace. Are there more advantages or disadvantages to this situation? Give your own opinion and include relevant examples. 73
- the line graph shows thefts per thounsand vehicles in 4 european countries between 1990 and 1999 73
- percentage of water used for different purposes in 6 countries 73
- abc 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, look, second, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1048.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13725490196 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99348902578 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.168170854 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.0 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27327349286 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114119379973 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616471274556 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15320101351 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0818525131746 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.4329268293 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.