The information below gives details about household income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in one UK city in 2010 and 2013
The charts illustrate the information about the income and the percentage of expenses for food and clothes in 5 different categories of a family in a city belonging to UK between 2010 and 2013.
Overall, it is obvious that the income of an average family decreased while there was an increase in the amount of money spent on food and clothes by them. Additionally, spending on food including fruits, vegetables, meat and fish was in the majority.
In the term of the amount of money a family earned, this figure was $29.000 in 2010 which was as high as in 2013 represented at $25.000. Nevertheless, expenses on food and clothes of a household saw an increased of $1.000 from $ 14.000 to $15.000 between 2010 and 2013.
In the term of the proportion of the amount of money spent on food and clothes, 20% expenses of a family in a UK city was spent on fruits and vegetables in 2010 which was a sharp decline in comparison with these expenses in 2013 represented 35%. For the amount of money for meat and fish of a family, this figure were 25% and 15% respectively in the period from 2010 to 2013.
A family in a UK city spent 15% expenses on dairy product in 2010 when this percentage saw a slight rise of 5% to 20% in 2013. The amount of money spent on other food and drinks remained unchanged at 18%, while the figure for clothes spent by a family saw a significant decrease from 20% in 2010 to 12% in 2013.
- The chart below shows the amount of time that 10 to 15-year-olds spending chatting on the Internet and playing on games consoles on an average school day in the UK. 73
- The charts below show the results of a survey conducted by a university library to find out the opinions of full-time and part-time students about its services. 67
- The charts below show the results of a survey conducted by a university library to find out the opinions of full-time and part-time students about its services. 61
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years. 67
- The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 216, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of a household saw an increased of .000 from $ 14.000 to 5.000 between 2010 and ...
^^
Line 5, column 223, Rule ID: CURRENCY_SPACE[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually written without any whitespace: '$14'.
Suggestion: $14
...ousehold saw an increased of .000 from $ 14.000 to 5.000 between 2010 and 2013. ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, nevertheless, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 33.7804878049 169% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1150.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 261.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.4061302682 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57392309977 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.39846743295 0.547539520022 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 337.5 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.0781661061 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.777777778 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33440288292 0.215688989381 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162027716231 0.103423049105 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0917214436347 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220036788719 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.082432788976 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.42 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.89 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.