The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by local authorities in Someland in 1980, 1990 and 2000.
The pie charts compares how many percentages of yearly expenditure paid by local authorities in Someland in the three years in 1980,1990, and 2000.
Overall, the level of tertiary cost held the lion’s share during the surveyed period, while payment for environmental services and others received the least attention.
Look at the pie charts for more detail, we can see that the proportion of expenditure on higher education stood at 35% in 1980, which was 5% lower than that in 2000 and then reached its peak at 45% in 1990. In addition, cost on K-12 Education reached its top in 1980, at 25%, it then plunged to 18% at the end of survey.
It is noted that the rate of expenditure on health and Human resource and transportation witnessed a significant fluctuation. The rate of transportation cost accounted for 16% in 1980, it then surged to 22% in 2000 after plunging to its rock bottom in 1990, at 6%. Similarly, health and human resource had 14% in 1980, it then topped the list at 20% in 1990 before plummeting to 10% at the end of survey. The striking feature is the expenditure of environmental services and others, accounting for roughly 4% to 9% during the survey period.
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011. 61
- The climograph below shows average monthly temperatures and rainfall in the city of Kolkata. 61
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel's customer service. The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010. 73
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011. 73
- The graph below shows female unemployment rates in each country of the United Kingdom in 2013 and 2014. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, similarly, so, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 984.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75362318841 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84900489016 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.4656034887 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.875 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188662242418 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0895391308281 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121368325462 0.0843802449381 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142372279834 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.146042422676 0.0819641961636 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.