TPO 48 Integrated
The lecture is about how the solutions made to solve the problem of declining frog populations are not practical.
First, reducing pesticides use by farmers is not fair or practical for the economy. Farmers relay on using pesticide to stay competitive or to decrease crop loss. If farmers follow a strict regulation regarding the use of pesticide, they will suffer from sever disturbance compering to farmers in other areas. This, however, contradicts the information mentioned in the reading.
Second, although there are effective treatments for the fungus, applying the new treatment to overcome the fungus problem is very difficult and expensive as it must be applied individually. Applying it on a large scale of frog populations would be impossible due to the fact it would be hard to catch them. Moreover, this treatment won't prevent the passing of fungus to off spreading, so it would require applying to several generations in-order to be effective.
Third, excessive water use or the draining of wetlands is not the biggest problem that is threatening frog populations. Global warming is much a bigger problem that threatens many other species in addition to frog. It has contributed to the disappearance and extinction of many entire species. Thus, preventing humans’ activities is unlikely to decrease the threaten facing frog populations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 360, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...pos; activities is unlikely to decrease the threaten facing frog populations.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, regarding, second, so, third, thus, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 12.0772626932 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 22.412803532 45% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1153.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 214.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38785046729 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03157244326 2.5805825403 117% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.626168224299 0.540411800872 116% => OK
syllable_count: 356.4 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.23620309051 12% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.7757698213 49.2860985944 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0833333333 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8333333333 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 7.06452816374 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 4.45695364238 224% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.400526789011 0.272083759551 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129004375603 0.0996497079465 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0824019491949 0.0662205650399 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206252416203 0.162205337803 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0706253754997 0.0443174109184 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.8541721854 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.42419426049 117% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.