In many parts of the world, people search for family history. Some people think that finding for the previous generations is a thing to do, but others think that it is better to be focus on present and future generations. Discuss both views and show your opinion.
A majority of people believes that searching for family history is critical while the other supposed that it is the present and future generations are what should be focus on. There are a great deal of contrasting idea on this issue.
To begin with, finding for the previous generations is good, but living with that past is not. Peole cannot influnce the past, whereas present and future are what human can affected and changed. If only focusing in the history but forgetting the reality, the future will not be the same. There are many cases when people are so obsessed with the family history, and resulted in ignoring the present and future. Because of that reason, people should not regard the previous generations and abandon the others.
On the other hand, history is something that is bounded within each person and cannot be denied. Knowing about the previous generations of the family is the way of keeping on the traditional values, and mental values. For example, handmade latern from China is an extraodinary work of art, and the secret of making the latern is descended by generations up to now. Therefore, if there is no curious about this secret, nobody learnt from the previous generations, then the method of making traditional Chinese latern would be passed away. Furthermore, by learning from the past, human will gain experience and may not make a same mistake.
In conclusion, I deem that it is important to know about past generation, but it does not mean obsessing with the history and neglecting the present and the future.
- People generally know that the environment is important. However, most individuals still don't take responsibility to protect the environment. Why is this? What should be done to encourage people to protect the environment 84
- Many people believe that social networking sites such as Facebook have a huge negative impact on both individuals and society To what extent do you agree or disagree
- The map below show a book store in 2000 and now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 60
- Some people believe that all the children in school are required to learn at least one foreign language However others say that those who are not talented do not have to learn What is your opinion 81
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compari
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'focused', 'focussed'?
Suggestion: focused; focussed
...d future generations are what should be focus on. There are a great deal of contrasti...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 195, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'deals'?
Suggestion: deals
...t should be focus on. There are a great deal of contrasting idea on this issue. To...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, so, then, therefore, whereas, while, for example, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1292.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91254752852 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55294243409 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528517110266 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 405.9 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7573158618 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3846153846 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2307692308 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53846153846 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2649486401 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.088595240109 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0789672975024 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158487894084 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100402270675 0.056905535591 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.