spending on art
Art has been a subject that attracts great attention in recent years. Some people argue that authorities should consider spending the state budget on some art purposes, while the opponents suggest that the artist's creation should be supporters by other sources. This essay aims to elaborate on both views and express my opinion.
On the one hand, the government may have a couple of troubles when giving financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Firsts of all, the state budget comes from the income of tax-payers. Therefore, it should be spent on the necessary purposes for the sake of citizens especially health care and education. In detail, the government needs to cover the expense in tuition fees of children and maintain the welfare system of the country. Moreover, the authority has to face enormous problems related to environment conservation and economic prosperity which require a large amount of finance to deal with.
On the other hand, the genius artists can be able to earn money for a living in many different ways. In today's world, thanks to technical innovation, the creative artists who are all the rage can take a lot of money by selling their appealing products or signing commercial contracts. For example, many renowned singers recently organize their own concert to meet their supporters' demand and by the way, it contributes to raise their incomes as well.
In conclusion, from my perspective, because the government has to give subsidies in many areas, genius artists should be funded by any alternative sources in society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-30 | hieu13092006 | 89 | view |
| 2023-05-27 | Siva_K | 84 | view |
| 2023-04-06 | Dinosaur | 67 | view |
| 2022-11-01 | evali233 | 89 | view |
| 2022-07-27 | lehonganh1212 | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Spend finance on art 56
- the positive and negative development of technology 95
- the bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups in 2010 61
- in a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.discuss both vi 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 207, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'artists'' or 'artist's'?
Suggestion: artists'; artist's
...s, while the opponents suggest that the artists creation should be supporters by other ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 81, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...n be able to earn money for a living in many different ways. In todays world, thanks to techni...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as, by the way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1327.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14341085271 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70010137644 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.624031007752 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0611948191 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.583333333 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0883982471825 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0293126370989 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663550615095 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0578591804428 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100215040211 0.056905535591 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.