The table below gives information about consumers spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.
The depicted table enumerates the comparative data on consumer expenditure on various products of five respective countries in the year 2002.
Overall, it is clear that the majority of people of all listed countries had spent their highest on food, drinks as well as tobacco. However, leisure and education represent the lowest portion.
In brief, in terms of food, drinks, and tobacco, Turkey makeup the highest trend which is nearly one-third. Similarly, the second-highest expenditure was made by Ireland at 28.91 percent, followed by Spain, Italy, and Sweden at 18.80 percent, 16.36 percent, and 15.77 percent respectively.
On the contrary, Italians seem to have spent the highest amount of expenses on clothing as well as footwear at approximately 9 percent. Moreover, there seems a marginal difference in the remaining countries. Furthermore, Turkey had experienced the largest ratio in the context of leisure and education at 4.35 percent. Likewise, Spanish people seem to spend the least expenses on the category of leisure and education which is a tiny portion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | Noah1997 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | shayma | 11 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | phungnguyen1611 | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | IVANTRUONG | 11 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | IVANTRUONG | 11 | view |
- The table below shows the primary funding sources of international students in the US during the years 2003 04 and 2013 14 Write a 150 word report for a university lecturer describing the data and make comparisons where relevant 39
- The chart below shows the global sales of different kinds of digital games from 2000 to 2006. 73
- The table below gives information about languages with the most natives speakers. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The two pie charts below show some employment patterns in Great Britain in 1992.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, likewise, moreover, second, similarly, third, well, as to, in brief, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 919.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47023809524 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91225979029 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613095238095 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.585731733 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.111111111 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.5555555556 5.23603664747 259% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0991006549575 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0447344342285 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693248007981 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.073825754883 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.081343727634 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.