The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.
Two pie charts compares the percentage of the average cost of household in two different countries, including Japan and Malaysia in 2010.
Overall, in two nations, most expenditures were spent on housing and food and other needs, in contrast, payment on healthcare gained the least popularity from local people.
A glance at the pie charts for more details, we can see that the rate of housing payment was 21% in Japan, which was 13% lower than that of Malaysia, at 34% ( the first rank). Nevertheless, the level of average expenditure on other demands in Japan topped the list, at 29%, compared to 26% of that in Malaysia. In Japan, the second rank belonged to food, accounted for 24% while the rate of food in Malaysia was 3% higher, at 27%.
A striking feature was the cost for transportation in both nations. Most people in Japan spent 20% their budget on commuting, which was twice as much as that of people in Malaysia. It is noted that people paid less attention to their health since it constituted 3% of healthcare expenditure in Malaysia, which was a half of that in Japan, at 3%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-20 | Chayacp | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | Jesslynindah | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | thanhthanh211 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | Zulph_ | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | faraj27 | 73 | view |
- Many people today especially in the developed world are choosing to have fewer children or none at all Why is this happening and do you think it is a good trend 68
- The chart below gives information about the UK s ageing population in 1985 and makes predictions for 2035 47
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel's customer service. The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010. 73
- The table below describes the number of employees and factories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901. 73
- Percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002, 2006 and 2010. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 157, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 13% lower than that of Malaysia, at 34% the first rank. Nevertheless, the level ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, nevertheless, second, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 905.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71354166667 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65324073822 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546875 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6665635312 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.125 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272437344427 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124097343332 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102109234579 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173216648297 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117087010534 0.0819641961636 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.