Countries with a long average working time are more economically successful than those countries which do not have a long working time. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people argue that long average working hours is the driving force behind bigger economies compared to smaller ones which do not exercise this practice. However, I disagree with this viewpoint and am convinced that education and innovation plays crucial role in it.
The argument that long working time could result in economic growth is baseless. It is argued that longer working hours automatically mean higher company profits, adding more taxes for the state to collect. However, majority of the economists agree that this could even pave the way for serious problems ahead. For instance, excessive working lead to tiredness, making employees to take sick leaves in the UK in the year of 2003. Likewise, Suicide cases at Foxconn, a Chinese manufacture Apple products, have lead the company to install nets to catch falling bodies at the company’s factory. Therefore, it is evident that longer working hours has no impact at all on economic development.
Contrary to long working time, education and innovation drive a consistent and stable economy. The access to education makes would-be workers available to be used in any country’s workforce which further attracts local and international entrepreneurs to purse business opportunities. India, for example, is a marketplace full of young educated workforce housing software companies from around the world. Likewise innovations play a vital role in reviving a country’s economy. Take the US as an example; countries around the world pay for innovations such as computer products, patent’s cost for technologies such as 4G to the country which make about 10% of their economy.
In conclusion, longer working hours does not automatically mean that a country would do well in terms of economic prosperity. In fact, education and innovation are the most important aspect of a stronger and consistent economy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-31 | jaskaranvir2k15 | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-07 | Ell | 73 | view |
| 2018-04-02 | ravishkazi | 93 | view |
- Some people believe that there will be a reduction in Air travel in the future Do you think this trend has positive or negative development 52
- Nowadays, some parents pressure their children to be successful in a specific field. What are the reasons for this? Is it a positive or negative development? 56
- Formal examinations are the only effective way to assess a student's performance. Continuous assessment such as course work and projects is not a satisfactory way to do this. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some companies sponsor sports as a way to advertise themselves. Some people think this is good while others think there are disadvantages. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- nowadays museums and historical sites sites are mainly visited by foreign tourists than locals why is this happening what can be done to attract locals to visit museums and historical sites more often 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 410, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Likewise,
...ftware companies from around the world. Likewise innovations play a vital role in revivi...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, likewise, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1607.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46598639456 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97965396139 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612244897959 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0381185027 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.133333333 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53333333333 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272328080618 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0886922939759 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0773736870077 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156215375402 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0135452110423 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.