Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Development of technology has led to an increase in the number of available jobs, which need various characteristics and expertise. While there is a paramount tendency towards giving higher significance to social abilities while holding a job, I strongly cling to this idea that it is far more important to study hard and have a great background of knowledge to be successful in a job. This essay will explore the reasons for my perspective in the following paragraphs.
The first reason that contributes to the higher importance of the educational abilities compared to the social ones is the fact that nowadays most of the projects conducted in the companies are a composition of several different professional fields, which need some employees with a very high knowledge to push the project forward. To put it in other words, it is exceptionally substantial for companies to higher top employees who are able to do a project efficiently. If a company could complete a project faster than its competitor, with lower costs and higher profits, it would be the winner of the competition and could acquire more projects. However, this is the result that only highly-educated people who are professional and expert in their fields can achieve. Thus, studying hard in school can provide students with a great opportunity of becoming a great expert who is able to drive the biggest projects home.
Secondly, due to the fact that in today's society plenty of projects are done in groups and need teamwork, it is not necessary for one employee to be good in different aspects of reaching the project's goal. In fact, a team constitutes from different individuals who show a vast array of different human characteristics. Some are able to respond to the professional requirements of the projects, and others are able to take care of the social aspects of the work. Thus, the whole team would benefit from the collaboration between the members. For example, a couple of years ago, I worked in an engineering company where I was responsible for the structural design of electrical transmission lines. We used to do projects in a group which was containing different members entailing some engineers in various fields and a manager. The manager himself took the responsibility to participate in meetings and persuade the participants about the different parts of projects. Having been supposed to do my own expertise, it was very comfortable for me to concentrate on my parts and finish them in time.
On the whole, taking all the aforementioned reasons into account, I believe that perceiving the good education as the vital factor for success in a job rather than the social abilities is more rational. Not only will this help people to do projects more efficiently, but it also can help them to exploit other people's useful traits and do projects in a team containing people with different abilities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | DHANDA | 90 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | naziii | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | sarah halawani | 65 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | liviapabreu | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-05 | Somayya | 76 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Agree or disagree? The rules that society today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. 73
- TPO43 78
- The following appeared in a newspaper article about law firms in the city of Megalopolis. "In Megalopolis, the number of law school graduates who went to work for large, corporate firms declined by 15 percent over the last three years, whereas an inc 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'several'.
Suggestion: several
...d in the companies are a composition of several different professional fields, which need some em...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 282, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[6]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'very high knowledge'.
Suggestion: very high knowledge
... fields, which need some employees with a very high knowledge to push the project forward. To put it ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 192, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'projects'' or 'project's'?
Suggestion: projects'; project's
...od in different aspects of reaching the projects goal. In fact, a team constitutes from ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 737, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...We used to do projects in a group which was containing different members entailing some engine...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example, in fact, in other words, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2419.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 481.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02910602911 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68313059816 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0443675828 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50103950104 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 759.6 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.6957305585 48.9658058833 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.388888889 100.406767564 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7222222222 20.6045352989 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197979095568 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0574309043013 0.076458572812 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537998930416 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140606876442 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0639960822509 0.0645574589148 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 86.8835125448 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.