Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Development of technology has led to an increase in the number of systematic and logical approaches to instruct students. While there are multiple advantages for teachers to offer group projects to the students, I believe that students are likely to learn to a large extent by conducting the projects individually. This essay will explore a couple of reasons supporting my perspective in the following paragraphs.
First of all, taking responsibility for an entire project, students are bound to evaluate all the aspects of the tasks to come up with innovative and pragmatic ideas. To put it in other words, due to the fact that the students are aware of their role in delivering a competent piece of work, they will put much effort in exploring the distinct sides of the problem to find the finest solutions. Thus, they will learn the materials they were to conduct research on effectively. For instance, my brother should hand in a project on his biology course at the end of the semester. Last week, he proceeded to the library near our house to explore non-identical resources addressing the contrasting facets of his subject. Thus, he had to develop a map for himself to consider the different questions he was to find a response to. This was extremely advantageous for my brother since he could examine the skill of critical thinking and raise his alertness about finding the distinct issues related to one special topic. Besides, he could gain a solid body of knowledge about the subject he is working on.
Secondly, regarding this fact that students are alone while accomplishing a duty, they have no choice but to carry out the complete project on their own resulting in a higher engagement in the various parts of a project. On the other hand, students, in a group project, divide the diverse sections of a project among all members of the team and focus on their parts separately, which means that each person has an overall understanding of his own section but not the whole project. I assume that a personal example can shed light on this notion. A couple of years ago, I studied a course of bridge engineering at university in which I was assigned to do my final project individually. Thus, I should divide the project requirements into three categories: finding the supreme type of the bridge for a given environment on the Internet, exploiting a worthwhile software to design the most efficient structure, looking for a way to write my report with the least quantity of flaws and so forth. Therefore, completing that project provided me with remarkable knowledge that I could not gain otherwise.
On the whole, taking all the aforementioned reasons and examples into account, I believe that finishing a project solely is more beneficial for students compared to the group projects. Not only, students must assess the different aspects of a topic themselves, but they also ought to undertake all the sections of a project containing many challenging tasks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | mashghanbar | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | liviapabreu | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | liviapabreu | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
- TPO47 90
- TPO54 3
- Agree or disagree? The rules that society today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. 73
- The following appeared in a newspaper article about law firms in the city of Megalopolis. "In Megalopolis, the number of law school graduates who went to work for large, corporate firms declined by 15 percent over the last three years, whereas an inc 16
- TPO40 83
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, look, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, as to, for instance, first of all, in other words, on the whole, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 82.0 52.1666666667 157% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2487.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 500.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.974 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72870804502 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87856839418 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 265.0 212.727598566 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 777.6 618.680645161 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.4334353424 48.9658058833 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.894736842 100.406767564 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3157894737 20.6045352989 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.26315789474 5.45110844103 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197731410176 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586909456485 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444797626529 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12671495009 0.150856017488 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286833909664 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 11.7677419355 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 140.0 86.8835125448 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.