International tourism is now more common than ever before. Some feel that this is a positive trend, while others do not.
What are your opinions on this?
The past 50 years have seen a considerable increase in international tourism. Yet, there remains some disagreement as to whether the overall effect of this trend is positive or negative. I personally believe both views are valid, which will be discussed in the following essay.
First of all, it is an indisputable fact that travel industry brings economic prosperity to the host countries. It creates an alternative income for the local people, creates more jobs opportunities for people in services like hotels or restaurants. Secondly, when foreigners come to a new country, they have to spend a lot on goods and souvenirs. Therefore, it brings to revenue to the government in form of tax. Consequently, international tourism stimulates the overall economic growth. Moreover, in terms of travelers, traveling abroad is a great chance for them to unwind and have fun by sightseeing new places. Tourism broadens their horizons and opens their mind by exposing with others customs and cultures. International tourism also has potential to foster greater understanding between people of different cultures.
On the other hand, booming international tourist industry is a double-edged sword. Despite its pivotal role in the economy, environment degradation is the serious concern for the government in destination countries. One of the world’s most popular bays, Maya Bay in Thailand, has become gradually polluted by ocean debris in recent years. Therefore, it was closed indefinitely to recover from the damage caused by millions of tourists.
By the way of conclusion, international tourism creates both advantages and drawbacks for the host countries. The government should have a balance view to not only stimulate the economy but also preserve the natural beauty of the tourist destinations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-04 | vivukhue | 73 | view |
| 2017-07-02 | ngdhai.hcmut | 78 | view |
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 61
- International tourism is now more common than ever before. Some feel that this is a positive trend, while others do not. What are your opinions on this? 73
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014. 78
- In the developed world, average life expectancy is increasing. What problems will cause for individuals and society? Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce the impact of aging populations. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 116, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...m. Yet, there remains some disagreement as to whether the overall effect of this trend is pos...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, as to, by the way, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1540.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51971326165 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1491529776 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641577060932 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.0841423325 49.4020404114 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.5882352941 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4117647059 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88235294118 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127035910242 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0382862057973 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509975210471 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.075460477696 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482870147722 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.44 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.