Sea otters population decline
The speaker contradicts the points with regards to three points as stated in passage by giving relevent points and examples that prove otherwise.Three points are main cause of death, ecological point and orca food change.
Firstly she explains that population of sea otters declined because of predators. According to speaker it is misconception that death was due to industrial pollution. Actually no dead otters were found at the sea shore. Usually when death of any sea animal happens due to pollution change then diseased or dead body get washed off to shore and there are no evidences of it. Thus she negates the information given in the passage.
Secondly, speaker denies validity of another point that food change. Other small mammals were also disappeared from shore because of pollution, it is quiet quantrary because whales were killed by humans and large predators like orca changed their food habits and they targeted small mammals like sea otters as well as sea lions .
Thirdly speaker denies validity of point that ecological change or environmental factors might have given uneven pattern gave uneven population of this small mammal. Furthermore she states that as orca is very large animal and the population of otters decreased in the area where orca whale can have access. population was higher in the area where orca can not access.
Hense in conclusion, the speaker lucidly substanciates her point of view with cogency.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-01 | Soham Chinchalkar | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-01 | Soham Chinchalkar | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-13 | zaid | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-06 | Naveena0 | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-06 | Vincent Samuel | 80 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 146, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Three
...oints and examples that prove otherwise.Three points are main cause of death, ecologi...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 375, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...shore and there are no evidences of it. Thus she negates the information given in th...
^^^^
Line 9, column 328, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...als like sea otters as well as sea lions . Thirdly speaker denies validity of...
^^
Line 13, column 167, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...uneven population of this small mammal. Furthermore she states that as orca is very large a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 309, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Population
... area where orca whale can have access. population was higher in the area where orca can n...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, firstly, furthermore, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, thus, well, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1226.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 234.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23931623932 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61085937783 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568376068376 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 380.7 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.23620309051 24% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.2031280731 49.2860985944 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.166666667 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06452816374 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253713422235 0.272083759551 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102352591671 0.0996497079465 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14657147303 0.0662205650399 221% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114347944644 0.162205337803 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113538724161 0.0443174109184 256% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.